論專利侵害之損害賠償計算-─從美國、中國大陸與台灣之專利修法談起

李柏靜

3.236.107.249，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

College of Law > Graduate Institute of Law and Inter-discipline (ILI)
Social Sciences > Law

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Search for full text in Holdings

There is no full-text available at the moment. Airiti would like to request author's authorization. I would like to provide authorization.

論專利侵害之損害賠償計算-─從美國、中國大陸與台灣之專利修法談起

Damages calculation in patent infringement-perspectives of patent reforms in the United States, China and Taiwan

李柏靜 , Masters　　Advisor：馮震宇　　

繁體中文

損害賠償；懲罰性損害賠償；專利侵權；侵犯專利；故意侵害；損害賠償計算； damages ； punitive damages ； increased damages ； patent infringement ； willful infringement ； damages calculation

Abstract │ Reference (167) │ Times Cited (3) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

For modernization of patent laws, the United States, China and Taiwan are undergoing patent reform, each amending its damages provision.  This thesis categorized forms of damages calculation in three countries, and tried to analyze its amendment from the perspective of patent reform in each country.  This thesis analyzed the possible impact of specifying the apportionment rule and entire market value rule in Section 284, 35 United State Code.  In addition, three standards of willful infringement with enhanced damages were concluded.  First, the traditional willfulness doctrine in Underwater Devices case is the affirmative duty of due care which sets a lower threshold of willing infringement that is more akin to negligence.  Second, willfulness in Seagate case requires at least an objective recklessness.  Third, willfulness in Patent Reform Act of 2009 requires an objective recklessness in three different conditions; such proposal may restrict the discretion of the court.  With national intellectual property strategy to improve the domestic capacity of innovation and to build an innovative country, the third amendment to Patent Act of the People's Republic of China becomes in effect in 2009.  Article 65 in the new Chinese Patent Act codifies the statutory damages in the range of RMB 10,000 to 1,000,000, compared to the current range of RMB 5,000 to 500,000 provided by the Supreme People’s Court judicial interpretation.  In the perspective of litigation costs, statutory damages award may be a more economic approach but subjective judgment could have implication caused by lack of factual evidence for damages calculation.  Article 65 also codifies that the amount of compensation shall include reasonable cost for ceasing patent infringement by the right holder, however, how to measure the reasonable cost is not clear.  Although the new Chinese Patent Act does not include punitive damages, the maximum statutory damages, other related civil liability and administrative penalty are increased.  Such amendments may increase the pecuniary burden of the infringer and expect to lead to more deterrent effect on patent infringement and encourage innovation.  In the context of international regulation change, national technology policy change and establishment of professional Intellectual Property Court, comprehensive review of Taiwanese Patent Act is ongoing.  The proposed bill adds “equivalent amount of royalty for implementing the patent invention as damages” into Article 85 of current Taiwanese Patent Act.  However, it is not clearly codified that a reasonable royalty must be justified and such royalty calculation is to set a floor for damages award.  The proposed bill abandons punitive damages for willful infringement.  In such proposal, the result of willful infringement may not be a substantial additional risk but only a cost of doing business, because the litigation cost and damages award are not so high, and there is no attorney fee award or criminal penalty in Taiwanese patent regulation system. Hence, reconsideration of retaining punitive damages is suggested.

Reference ( 167 ) 〈TOP〉

2. 王文杰，嬗變中之中國大陸法制，2004年。
連結：
11. 許忠信，從德國法之觀點看我國專利權侵害之損害賠償責任，台北大學法學論叢，61期，2007年3月。
連結：
12. 陳聰富，美國法上之懲罰性賠償金制度，收錄於陳聰富、陳忠五、沈冠伶、許仕宦合著，美國懲罰性賠償金判決之承認及執行，2004年12月。
連結：
17. 馮震宇，美國專利訴訟制度與程序要件，資訊法務透析，1995年8月號，1995年8月。
連結：
22. 劉尚志、王文杰、陳建宏，中國專利侵權損害賠償之實證研究，2008年全國科技法律研討會論文集，2008年11月。
連結：

Times Cited (3) 〈TOP〉

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：