花東線鐵路林榮車站復站之研究：協力治理觀點

陳美如

18.206.177.17，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

College of Law and Politics > Graduate Institute of National Policy and Public Affairs
Social Sciences > Politics

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Search in Library

There is no full-text available at the moment. Airiti would like to request author's authorization. I would like to provide authorization.

花東線鐵路林榮車站復站之研究：協力治理觀點

A Study of Reconstruction of Linrong Station in Hualien-Taitung Line Railway：The Perspective of Collaborative Governance

陳美如 , Masters　　Advisor：李長晏　　

繁體中文

協力；治理；公私部門；林榮車站；復站； collaboration ； governance ； public and private sectors ； Linrong station ； reconstruction of station

Abstract │ Reference (100) │ Times Cited (1)

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

This research study on the case of the reconstruction of Linrong Station in Hualien-Taitung Line Railway,Taiwan, through the perspectives of collaborative governance. The aims of this research focus on the evolution stages and the strategies of this railway station revival, the forerunner of public-private cooperation in this domain in Taiwan, and the analysis of the critical factors that took part in the successes of this implementation.
    The collaborative governance model has presented an alternative approach to public management, and moreover, provide the opportunity of additional resources sponsoring. It includes a series of collaborative acting and interaction, and therefore, the conditions of participation, the incentives to participation, the form of participation and the attitude toward participation will influence the formation of collaboration. The dynamic variables that influence the outcomes embrace stakeholders’ interdependence and social capital accumulation. The factors of these two variables are: authority, resources, expertise, history of collaboration, incentives and limitations, face to face dialogue, trust building, commitment, shared understanding, institutional design and facilitative leadership, etc.
In this study, a review of literature on collaborative governance were conducted and records of in-depth interviews with stakeholders were analyzed from the collaborative perspectives. In order to explore the key factors that influenced the development and implementation in this public-private sector cooperation, this case study focus on three aspects: the starting condition of the collaboration, the process of the collaboration and the structure of the collaboration. And the major conclusions of this study include:
（1）Dependence and interdependence of power and resources appeared to be the momentum of collaboration.
（2）The history of antagonism or successful collaboration did not play crucial roles in this case.
（3）Rational self-interests and political factors are the main incentives or compulsion of participating.
（4）Adequate face to face dialogue failed in break down selfish departmentalism.
（5）Trust or common consensus did not guarantee success, but agreements and contracts will. 
（6）Common consensus reached and promises made through negotiations tend to be discarded facing the position deviation.
（7）Collective deliberation and knowledge sharing benefits the invention of viable plans.
（8）The design of the institutional framework of this public-private cooperation case is based on the new private participation models, professional assessments, conventional regulations and collaboration contracts. 
（9）Facilitative leadership with new thinking is the best catalyzer of collaboration.
This study suggests:
（1）The transparency and law adopting of Public policy planning and implementation must be flexible where environmental context transforms.
（2）In the case where mutual trust and autonomy is insufficient, facilitative leadership become critical.
（3）Government agencies can make use of the capacity of corporate social responsibility, which enterprise has been always exercising, to facilitate local development.
（4）Take advantage of the influence of mass media. Make them marketing tools of policies, otherwise, they become obstructors.

Reference ( 100 ) 〈TOP〉

張有恆（2005）。《現代運輸學》。臺北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
連結：
王千文、陳敦源（2012）。〈形式上還是實質上的「公私協力」：全民健康保險總額支付制度個案分析〉。《公共行政學報》，第42期，頁99-137。
連結：
林淑馨（2011）。（民間參與公共建設的迷思與現實：日本公立醫院PFI 之啟示）。《公共行政學報》，第39期，頁：1-35。
連結：
高嘉濃（2012）。〈從促參業務之推動探討公私部門合作機制〉。《中華技術》，第90期，頁：53-60。
連結：
蔡允棟（2002）。〈新治理與治理工具的選擇：政策設計的層次分析〉。《中國行政評論》，第11卷第2期，頁47-76。
連結：

Times Cited (1) 〈TOP〉

黃昭儒(2015)。中石化安順廠汙染整治問題之協力治理分析。臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系學位論文。2015。1-252。

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：