從環境品質面探討都市更新公益性及規劃設計容積獎勵妥適性之研究 -以台北市中山區為例-

Study on urban remodeling public and design zoning bonus from Environmental Quality Evaluation-Taking Taipei Zhong-Shan District as example

劉佳其(Chia-Chi Liu)

指導教授 ： 蘇瑛敏

國立臺北科技大學/設計學院/建築與都市設計研究所/碩士(2009年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2009.00122

摘要

都市更新之目的在使都市機能提升、生活品質改善，各更新區或更新單元將因此獲得再發展的機會，改善地區環境品質及提升居住水準。雖然實施多年以來都市更新案件量有大幅成長趨勢，但其容積獎勵申請項目卻對地區發展無顯著影響，反造成地區硬體設施大幅更新而環境品質無法提升的情況，違背了實施都市更新的原意，惡化都市生活品質。
本研究藉由國內外相關環境品質文獻，彙整出與都市更新容積獎勵相關之項目，再整合成知覺價值分析與實證分析兩部份評估項目，進行中山區都市更新案例之評估。目的為釐清都市更新公益性及規劃設計容積獎勵所提供之公益設施，是否符合地區環境居民之需求，以探討其實質效益為何，並分析中山區在地區發展上及都市更新容積獎勵所遇到之問題。
本研究發現，都市更新之目的在於提升環境品質，但藉由容積獎勵所提供之公益設施卻無法因地制宜的滿足需求，主要問題有：（一）缺乏都市發展願景，造成地區發展混亂；（二）都市更新規模小，產生之效益低；（三）民眾認知不足，無法凝聚共識；（四）容積獎勵項目不足，無法針對地區需求規範。在此情況之下本研究參考相關文獻及國內外案例之借鏡提出修正對策：（一）提出中山區都市發展願景，研擬地區發展對策；（二）利用分期分區開發方式，確保完整街廓開發效益；（三）普及民眾都市更新知識，提升認同感；（四）增加容積獎勵項目及篩選機制，使其能因地制宜。本研究期望藉由研究成果提供中山區都市更新明確的發展目標，以發揮都市更新應有之效益，提升地區環境品質。

關鍵字

都市更新 ； 容積獎勵 ； 環境品質

並列摘要

The Urban Renewal purpose is enable to city function improve that improve the life quality. The Urban Renewal area and the Urban Renewal unit are obtain development’s chance. Improve life quality and raise living standards.

Though implemented Urban Renewal case are amount of growth. But apply for zoning bonus project isn’t influence to regional development, cause regional hardware facility upgrade but life quality can’t raise. Violate the Urban Renewal’s original meanings that worsen the life quality.

This study is by life quality Related literature of domestic and foreign. Collects entire Related project from Urban Renewal and Zoning bonus. Integrate Perceived value and Empirical analysis with Appraisal project, Evaluation of the Zhong-Shan district’s Urban Renewal case.

The research goal is analysis the Urban Renewal public and design Zoning bonus Provides the public area facility whether to meet demand of the local resident. Discussion the essence benefit. Analyzes the question of the Zhong-Shan district develop and Urban Renewal zoning bonus.

This research discovery, the Urban Renewal goal to upgrades the life quality but the zoning bonus provides the public welfare facility actually to be unable to meet the need.

The question lies in :
1.Lacks the metropolis development targets, creates the local development confusion.
2.The Urban Renewal scale is small. Causes the benefit to reduce.
3.The populace cognition is insufficient, unable to condense the mutual recognition .
4.Zoning bonus not enough, unable to meet the need.

Therefore the research reference related literature and the domestic and foreign case experience proposes the revision countermeasure.
1.Proposes the Zhong-Shan district development soal, plan for the local development countermeasure.
2.Using by phasing plan to guarantees the complete blocks development benefit.
3.Popularize people’s Urban Renewal knowledge, promotion the identity.
4.Increase the Zoning bonus project and filtering functionality causes it to suit local circum stances.

This research expects to provision the Explicit development goal for Zhong-Shan district, displays the Urban Renewal original benefit, promotes the local life quality.

並列關鍵字

urban Renewal ； zoning bonus ； Environmental Quality Evaluation

參考文獻

[17]謝雅卿，台北市實施綜合設計地區環境品質之評估，臺灣大學，2005。

[19]陳玫秀，都市地區居住環境品質對居民居住滿意度影響之研究，國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文，2005。

[6]曾國雄、曹勝雄、廖耀東，《臺北都會區土地使用形態與環境品質之研究》都市與計劃第19卷第1期，頁33-52，1992。

[1]Philip H.Friedly，Welfare Indicators For Public Facility Investments in Urban Renewal Areas，1969。

[2]Chester Rapkin，An Evaluation of the Urban Renewal Experience in the USA，1980。