再見瑠公圳-記憶場域的空間再現

Return to Hydraulic Irrigation System Lio-Kong- the Representation of Memorial Sites

李承遠(Cheng-Yuan Lee)

指導教授 ： 林靜娟

國立臺北科技大學/設計學院/建築與都市設計研究所/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2013.00417

摘要

本研究以殘存的臺北市地景－瑠公圳為對象，探討作為承載歷史脈絡、文化與自然環境的重要文化資產，如何藉由記憶空間再現，重新拉近人與土地的重要關係與文化能量。在觀點建立上，以記憶之論述質疑受歷史意識的「客觀性」影響，所生的現行文化景觀保存模式之外，是否具有其它的操作可能性，本研究的進行主要分為三個階段：
一.實證研究：透過蒐集相關文獻與史料，嘗試逼近真實的瑠公圳昔日面貌，並透過文獻蒐集與現況對照的田野調查，試圖釐清瑠公圳水利設施遭誤指或誤傳的部分區段，並找尋現存的瑠公圳殘存地景。
二.理論歸納：本研究以「空間再現」為目標，在理論研析上可分為兩部分：
(一)空間實踐：藉由列斐伏爾「空間生產」作為基礎，並以「第三空間」的開放性思考與「差異地點」的空間性質界定分析架構；(二)歷史與記憶：以柏格森、班雅明對於歷史意識的批判及記憶的運作方式，嘗試連接、縫補時間、空間與記憶三者的關係性，構成一兼具真實與想像的第三空間再現論述，做為後續章節空間再現操作的基礎架構與運作方式。
三.設計操作：運用本研究歸結之空間再現理論，以田野調查發掘之瑠公圳特殊空間為操作對象，回應本研究問題意識，重新喚起文化地景對於人類與自然環境的重要價值所在。
本研究提供的並非做為文化景觀的保存方法論，反之，而是希望藉由詮釋再現的空間，重新思考對於文化景觀更多的空間想像與空間實踐，藉由記憶空間再現論述回到文化景觀的本質，並反思再現的記憶對於當代社會的意義與啟發性，以尋找更多埋藏在場所地方的事件與記憶情感，函構具有多重想像以及可能性的場所空間。

關鍵字

瑠公圳 ； 空間再現 ； 第三空間 ； 差異地點 ； 記憶場域

並列摘要

This research choosing the the surviving Taipei landscape - Hydraulic Irrigation System Lio-Kong as the subject, aimed to explore how to represent through memory an important cultural asset that encompass the elements of historical context, culture and natural environment, and reconnect the relations and cultural energy between human and nature. In terms of perspective constructions, the study attempted to, with the discourse of memory, scrutinize the contemporary preservation model of culturescapes derived from the “objectivity” of historical consciousness, and seek alternatives as replacement. The study can be categorized into three main sections:
(1.)Empirical Research:
The study attempted to reestablish an accurate historical portrayal of Hydraulic Irrigation System Lio-Kong by researching relevant literatures and historical data, and to compare it with its contemporary conditions from the field research to: 1)Clarify certain misinformed locations of Hydraulic Irrigation System Liu-Kong and 2) discover the accurate sites or remnants of Hydraulic Irrigation System Lio-Kong.
(2.) Theoretical Induction:
The purpose of the study was the “representation of space”, and in terms of theoretical analysis, it can be categorized into two sections:
1)Practice of Space: with Henri Lefebvre’s “The Production of Space” as foundation, and incorporating the divergent thinking of “The Third Space” and the spatial properties of “Heterotopia” to define and analysis structures;
2)History and Memories: by employing Henri Bergson and Walter Benjamin’s criticisms of historical consciousness and the operation of memories, connect and weave the relationship among time, space and memory, and draft a discourse of heterotopia that infuses reality and imagination as the fundamental structure and operation for the subsequent chapter which deals with the operation of spatial representation.

(3.) Operation Design:
By applying the spatial representation theories concluded in the study and with Hydraulic Irrigation System Lio-Kong, an unique site discovered during the field research, as the subject, the author answered, reawaken the values of cultural landscapes to both human beings and natural environment.
The study aimed not at presenting the preservation methodologies of culturescapes, but rather to encourage one to rethink the spatial imagination and practices of contemporary culturescapes by interpreting the represented space, to return to the essence of culturescapes via the representation of memorial sites; to reflect on the significance and inspiration of represented memory on contemporary society in order to construct venues possessing multiple imaginations and possibilities by discovering more incidents and sentiments buried within these locations.

並列關鍵字

Hydraulic Irrigation System Lio-Kong ； Representation of Space ； the Third Space ； Heterotopias ； Memorial Sites

參考文獻

13.羅淑娥，都市歷史水圳空間再現之研究-以光華區段瑠公圳再現為例，國立台北科技大學碩士論文，2008

5.吳銘興，臺灣異質空間之研究－以台中市逢甲商圈為例，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所碩論，2006

6.趙晏正，從文化景觀脈絡探討聚落保存價值：以台南縣江家聚落為例，國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩論，2007

8.白力元，都市中的差異地點－以台中市七期重劃區的汽車旅館為例，國立臺北大學都市計畫研究所碩論，2008

9.趙珮華，當代城市空間遊牧者-創意市集的公共地誌，臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所碩論，2010