摘 要 張愛玲在兩岸三地的研究蔚然成風,相關論述光是在台灣,碩博士論文就有三十餘篇、更遑論專書專論,書目幾乎可以成冊。相比之 下,胡蘭成的研究景況卻無此盛況,大陸雖有兩篇碩士論文,但在 台灣仍是「隸屬」性的研究。本篇論文的預期目的,是希望能使胡 蘭成其人、其文與其思想體系,都能獲得重視。胡氏豐富的生命歷 程與文學的表現息息相關,雖然胡氏的生命歷程正是大多數學者詬 病的生命污點,但其在台講學的短短數年間,不但參與張愛玲的經 典化過程,也親手培植文學青年,以「三三群士」為號召,其中成 為優秀作家的不在少數,如朱天文、朱天心等人,可見胡蘭成對台 灣文壇所帶來的貢獻是不容忽視的,因而筆者認為,不論是台灣文 壇的研究以及張學研究,胡蘭成都是一塊不可或缺的拼圖。
ABSTRACT The study of Chang Eileen is popular among China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, there are more than 30 relevant essays just solely within Taiwan, not to mention other specific books and studies, all the books almost get into full volumes. In contrast with Hu Lan Cheng, whose study is not so common, although there are two master’s essays in mainland China, it still belongs to subsidiary research in Taiwan. The intention of this essay is to make Hu Lan Cheng himself, his literature and philosophy getting more attention. Hu’s abundant life experiences have so much to do with his literature performance. Though Hu’s life experiences are the defects that most scholars talk about, his short period of years spending in Taiwan for teaching, not only participating in the classical process of Chang Eileen, but also cultivating literature youth by calling of San-san Literary Group, of which many excellent writers generated, such as Chu Tien Wen, Chu Tien Hsin and so on. Therefore his contribution to literature field of Taiwan can ‘t be ignored, hence the writer contends that no matter with the study of Taiwan literature, or of Chang Eileen, Hu Lan Cheng is an indispensable master.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。