運用分析網路程序法評選自動化搬運系統

Using Analytic Network Process for Selection of an Automated Material Handling System

侯祐鵬(YU-PENG HO)

指導教授 ： 許棟樑

國立清華大學/工學院/工業工程與工程管理學系/碩士(2007年)

摘要

近年來液晶顯示器產業快速發展之下，企業為求生存，需要不斷地投資建廠。建廠速度與生產，成為液晶產業關注的焦點。而選擇一項自動化搬運系統，關係著工廠能否順利生產的關鍵。本研究以分析網路程序法（Analytic Network Process ，ANP）整合群體決策流程，在效益、成本、風險，三種策略考量之下，進行自動化搬運系統的評選。透過實證分析可以了解，以分析網路程序法結合其軟體Super Decision 來協助專家小組進行評選，可以了解決策目標的多層面與相互依賴的問題，其建構評選模式，可提供業界參考。

關鍵字

液晶顯示器 ； 自動化搬運系統 ； 分析網路程序法 ； 群體決策

並列摘要

With the fast Development of the liquid-crystal display industry in recent years, enterprises striving for their survivals need to invest unceasingly to build factories. The build up speed and productivity of the factories become a focal point of the liquid-crystal display industry. Therefore, Selection of an automatic transporting system is definitely a key factor for smooth production. This research uses analytic network process (ANP) and group decision process to evaluate automatic transporting systems using benefit, cost and risk as fundamental factors. Analysis of a real case implementation demonstrated that ANP in association with the use of Super Decision software can effectively facilitate efficient team evaluation and inlaid the interrelated factor armory the multitude of decision criteria. The model for system selection can be reused for future applications.

並列關鍵字

TFT_LCD ； AMHS ； ANP ； Group decission

參考文獻

32.陳虹遐，「應用分析網路程序法於液晶電視之生態效益評估」，國立成功大學工業設計學系研究所碩士論文，2004 。

1.Wilson, E.J., “The Relative Importance of Suppliers Selection Criteria: a Review and Update”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol.30, No.3, 35-41, 1994.

2.Dickson, G.W. ”An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions”, Journal of Purchasing, Vol.2, No.1, 5-17, 1966.

5.Muralidharan, C., Ananthaaraman, N., Deshmukh, S.G.,”A multi-Criteria Group Decision-making Model for Supplier Rating”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38, 4, 22-33, 2002.

7.Iz, P., Gardiner, R.L. ”Analysis of Multiple Criteria Decision Support Systems for Cooperative Groups”, Group Decision and Negotiation, (2:1), 61-79, 1993.