認罪協商法制之研究

A study of Plea Bargaining

林秉暉(Biing-Huei Lin)

指導教授 ： 黃朝義

中原大學/商學院/財經法律研究所/碩士(2001年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200100350

摘要

摘 要
鑑於民國八十六年底修正刑事訴訟法，嘗試引進英美法上之認罪協商制度，以解決司法負擔過重之問題，本文乃以認罪協商制度之論述為經，我國相關之規範為緯，比較分析、研究檢討之，並進一步地尋求制度外更好之解決方式。
第一章敘述研究之動機、目的及方法、範圍。
第二章針對認罪協商之內涵，分別說明其實行之程序、沿革發展、理論、規範根據、種類及其與有罪答辯概念之區分。
第三章提出了與認罪協商制度相關的法律問題，如影響認罪協商之因素、被告「罪」「刑」認定之問題、及認罪協商對被告、檢察官、法官所生法律上效力之問題等。
第四章乃以我國簡易程序為基礎，進而探討我國現行之協商制度，即除對我國類似認罪協商之制度為一簡介、比較外，並闡述採納此制與否之爭議、現行規範產生之問題、及其將來修正之方向，針對現行實務運作之情形，提出相關或法制外之解決之道。
第五章結論，係肯認認罪協商此一新制之改革，並期勉就現行法制加以研討改進，參酌相關司法外處理之制度與經驗，以使刑事司法均能達更迅速、妥適之目標。
附錄一為德、日、英、法等國類似制度之簡介。
附錄二則為一則實務上運用認罪協商制度之案例，供參考對照之。

關鍵字

有罪答辯 ； 簡易訴訟 ； 認罪協商

並列摘要

Abstract
At 1997, R.O.C introduces the “Plea Bargaining” institution to solve the over-heavy problem of the judicature. This article which are discussed in the following five parts contains the description of “Plea Bargaining”, analysis of our country’s rules, and seeks for other better method.
In the first chapter, I describe the motives, goals, methods, and range of my research.
In the second chapter, I focus on the meaning of “Plea Bargaining”, and illustrate the procedures of its practice, history, theory, regulative fundament, types, and the difference between the “Plea of Guilty” and “Plea Bargaining”.
In the third chapter, I propose the legal problems about the “Plea Bargaining”, such as the factor affecting it, the criminal and penal definition of a defendant, and the legal efficacy to the defendant, the public procurator, and the judge in the “Plea Bargaining”.
In the fourth chapter, I discuss the “Summary Procedure” and our present institutions, which not only introduces and compare the similar institutions of our country but also describe the disputation of adding this new institution, the problems of present institutions, and the possibly solvable ways.
In the fifth chapter, I admit the reform of new institution (Plea Bargaining), and wish we can improve the judicial system to achieve a more prompt and perfect situation.
In the appendix I, there is the brief introduction of the similar institution in Germany, Japan, England, France, etc.
In the appendix II, there is a practical case for your reference.

並列關鍵字

Plea of Bargaining ； Summary procedure ； Plea of guilty

參考文獻

33、張麗卿，起訴便宜原則的比較研究，台大法學論叢，第二十五卷，第三期，一九九六年。

8、李震山，人性尊嚴之憲法意義，律師通訊，第一百五十期，一九九二年三月。

30、最高法院八十一年臺非字第二八八號判決要旨，最高法院刑事裁判書彙編第九期，一九九三年。

33、最高法院八十一年臺非字第二八八號判決要旨，最高法院刑事裁判書彙編第九期，一九九三年。

40、顧立雄，對此次刑事訴訟法修正的一些看法，律師雜誌，第二二O期，一九九八年一月。