DOI
stands for Digital Object Identifier
(
D
igital
O
bject
I
dentifier
)
,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.
Using DOI as a persistent link
To create a persistent link
「
https://doi.org/
」
before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is
10.5297/ser.1201.002
, you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser:
https://doi.org/
10.5297/ser.1201.002
。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.
Cite a document with DOI
When citing a document with a DOI, the DOI permanent URL should always be presented (if using APA or Chicago format, present https://doi.org/DOI number). If using a citation format that does not specify DOI, the DOI permanent URL should still be presented as a priority.
DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration ( doi.airiti.com ) 。
GATT/WTO爭端解決體系下「非違反協定行為 之控訴」之研究
The Non-Violation Complaint under the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System
黃政傑 , Masters Advisor:李貴英
繁體中文
DOI:
10.6840/cycu200200515
爭端解決 ; 非違反協定行為之控訴 ; 世界貿易組織 ; Non-Violation Complaint ; WTO ; Dispute Settlement


- 6. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich(1997). The GATT-WTO Dispute Settlement System:International Law , International Organizations and Dispute Settlement. Kluwer Law International.
連結: - 2. 牛惠之(1999),〈國際環境公約與GATT/WTO之潛在衝突:論相關於環境貿易措施與獎勵性措施之運用與爭議〉,《國立台灣大學法學論叢》第二十八卷第四期,第193頁至第245頁。
連結: - 9. 洪德欽(1999),〈WTO爭端解決體系之研究〉,《國立台灣大學法學論叢》第二十八卷第四期,第247頁至第316頁。
連結: - 9. Chua , Adrian T.L. (1998). “Reasonable Expectations and Non-Violation Complaints in GATT/WTO Jurisprudence”, 32(2) Journal of World Trade , at 27-50.
連結: - 15. Hansen , Patricia Isela. (1999). “Antitrust in the Global Market: Rethinking “Reasonable Expectations”, S. Cal. L. Rev. Vol.72, at 1601-1649.
連結: