創造性問題解決教學對國小學童創造力 及問題解決能力影響之研究

A study of the effects of creative problem solving instruction on creativity and problem solving ability of elementary students

朱俊龍(Chun-Lung Chu)

指導教授 ： 楊坤原

中原大學/人文與教育學院/教育研究所/碩士(2008年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200800360

摘要

本研究目的在於瞭解創造性問題解決教學模式對於國小學生科技創造力及問題解決能力之影響。本研究採取準實驗研究法中的「不相等前後測控制組設計」，以桃園縣某國小的二個四年級班級為研究對象，實驗組接受自然科創造性問題解決教學模式，控制組則接受自然科講述式教學法。本研究為期十週，每週三節課共30節課，所使用的研究工具為「科技創造力測驗」及「新編問題解決測驗」。在量化資料分析所採取的統計方法包括了描述統計、配對樣本t考驗及單因子共變數分析，質性資料則是晤談內容分析以及教學札記分析。本研究主要結果如下：

一、在創造力方面：接受創造性問題解決教學的實驗組學生在流暢力、變通力、
獨創力、精進力及總分，均顯著優於接受講述式教學的控制組學生。而在視
覺造型方面，則無顯著的差異存在。
二、在問題解決能力方面：接受創造性問題解決教學的實驗組學生在界定原因、
解決方法、預防問題、有效性及總分，均顯著優於接受講述式教學的控制組
學生。而在變通性方面，則無顯著的差異存在。

最後根據研究發現提出相關建議，提供學校教育與未來研究作為教學實施及深入研究的參考。

關鍵字

問題解決能力 ； 創造性問題解決教學 ； 創造力

並列摘要

The purposes of this study is to realize the effects of the creative problem solving instruction model on technology creativity and problem solving ability for elementary students. An unequal group pretest-posttest design was employed in this study. Two fourth-grade classes of a elementary school in Tao Yuan country were selected to be the research sample. The experimental group received the instruction which is creative problem solving instruction model, while the control group received regular lecture instruction. The research frequency is three classes a week, and the all research time is lasting ten weeks. The employed research instruments included Technological Creativity Test, Reorganization Problem Solving Test. The quantitative analysis method included descriptive statistics, paired-sample t test, one-way ANCOVA while the qualitative data is to analyze the interview content and teachers’ teaching notes. The main findings were as followed:
1. In regard to the creativity, the students of experimental group got higher scores on fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration and total than those of control group. However, there were no significant differences in vision model.
2. In regard to the problem solving ability, the students of experimental group got higher scores on finding causes, finding solutions, avoiding problems, effectiveness and total than those of control group. However, there were no significant differences in flexibility.
Finally, the researcher proposed some suggestions for educational instruction and future studies.

並列關鍵字

problem solving ability ； creative problem solving instruction ； creativity

參考文獻

官美君（2002）。啟動國小學生創造性問題解決機制之研究-以「彩色光

影魔術師」教學活動為例。國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論

張振松（2002）。自然科創造性問題解決教學對國小學童創造力及問題解

劉誌文（1994）。國民小學自然科創造性問題解決教學效果之研究。國立

張志豪 （2000）。高中生活科技課程創造思考教學對學生學習成效之影