技術移轉合資行為之研究－以我國與歐盟競爭法為中心－

A Study on the Joint Venture of Technology Transfer centered in Competition Law of R.O.C. and European Union

蔡鈞柔(Chun-Jou Tsai)

指導教授 ： 李憲佐

中原大學/商學院/財經法律研究所/碩士(2007年)

https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2007.00654

摘要

本論文之研究題目為「技術移轉合資行為之研究－以我國與歐盟競爭法為中心」，對我國產業而言，相關技術移轉問題已有諸多文獻探討單純授權及共同研發之議題，而透過合資行為取得先進技術、擴張企業經營範疇，在我國技術移轉實務上仍有推動之空間。競爭法係在處理對競爭有妨礙之行為（反競爭行為），最主要之反競爭行為於競爭者相互約定不進行競爭（聯合行為）、具有市場支配地位之廠商濫用其市場地位、及企業合併致使市場競爭可能會有相當程度減少等情形（結合行為）。關於合資行為涉及競爭法時，究竟應依結合行為或聯合行為予以規範，因欠缺明確之規範標準，相當難以釐清，雖然行政院公平交易委員會認係屬個案認定之問題，但在合資行為中何者為結合？何者為聯合？其界線在何處？似有進一步探討之必要。

為俾使企業易有明確標準可資依循，因此本論文以歐盟競爭法角度切入，研究重點為歐盟與我國現行競爭法對於合資行為之規範，採用文獻蒐集彙總、比較分析方式。首先闡明技術移轉、合資之基本概念與理論後，再深入探討歐盟競爭法涉及合資之相關規範及相關實務案例，分析、比較與探討合資行為所涉及技術移轉之規範及可能產生之法律議題，最後從法學方法上與我國現行公平法規範比較、分析，檢視我國競爭法政策及相關規範是否有精進之處。

最後總結前述各章節的討論研究，歸納後並提出幾點建議，以作為本論文的結論，以期提供我國產業進行合資行為、公平會審核合資案件及制定合資相關處理原則之參考。

關鍵字

技術移轉 ； 合資行為 ； 聯合行為 ； 結合行為 ； 競爭法

並列摘要

The title of this paper is ‘A Study on the Joint Venture of Technology Transfer centered in Competition law of R.O.C. and European Union’. As for the domestic industries, there are many papers and studies discussing the licensing and collaborations issues concerning related technology transfer; nonetheless, the attainment of advanced technology and expansion of business operation through joint venture remains space for the promotion concerning technology transfer practice. Competitive Law deals with the preventive behaviors of competitiveness (anticompetitive practice), i.e. the unfair competitive treaty between competitors, abuse of the dominating business owners with the superior marketing position, and the business merge leading to the lessening market competitiveness. The joint venture involving Competitive Law is hard to clarify due to the deficiency of clear definition concerning criteria for the foresaid behaviors. Although Fair Trade Commission identifies that the foresaid issue pertains to the case identification, the necessity of inquiry for the definition of collaboration and merger amidst joint venture and the boundary between the two behaviors exists.

In order to offer the definite guidlines for the business, this paper hereby addressed the angle of EU Competitive Law and focused on the regulations of current competitive law/act employed by EU and ROC via literature collection and collation and comparison analysis. In the first part, the basic concept and theory of technology transfer and joint venture were stated; then the further exploration of the relevant regulations and practical cases involving the joint venture were processed. The pertinent codes of technology transfer and the possible legal issues were accordingly analyzed, compared and discussed. In the final part, at the angle of legal methodology, the foresaid data were compared and analyzed with the current applicable Fair Trade Act in Taiwan to inspect the space of improvement for the domestic Competitive Law and the related norm.

At last, the discussions and research in the preceding chapters were summirzed and some suggestions were addressed accordingly as the conclusions of this paper and as the references to the joint venture conducted by domestic industries and to the case examination and related treatment principles concerning joint venture for Fair Trade Commission.

並列關鍵字

competition law ； technology transfer ； joint venture

參考文獻

7、李素華、黃慧嫻，促進產業升級條例增定第19條之2、第19條之3技術入股課稅對我國技術授權實務之影響分析，科技法律透析，2005年1月。

8、李素華，OECD產研互動研究報告對我國科技基本法及技術移轉相關法制之省思，科技法律透析，2003年3月。

51、楊益昇，技術移轉合資協議法律研析，科技法務透析 2003年2月。

11、李素華，技術移轉合資涉及之競爭法規範（下），科技法律透析，2002年11月。

36、張聖怡，探討技術授權涉及專業進行重整及破產程序之法律間題，科技法律透析，2002年10月。