透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.14.70.203
  • 學位論文

運用教師社群發展國小數學教師TPCK 之行動研究

An Action Research of Using Community of Teachers to Develop An Elementary School Mathematics Teacher's TPCK

指導教授 : 張世忠

摘要


摘要 本研究目的有三:一為紀錄六位教師成員所組成之教師社群運作歷程;其次紀錄研究者參與教師社群,並應用IWB於27名國小一年級學生的數學教學中,研究者之TPCK如何發展;其三紀錄研究中的困境與解決之道。 本研究以行動研究的方式,歷經一個多學期(98年8月至99年1月),共兩個循環。蒐集質性資料包含教學錄影、社群會議記錄、省思札記、數學教師TPCK評鑑問卷等資料,並採用Patton(1990)建議的步驟,將彙整原始資料加以組織、分類與編輯為資料檔,從中進行深入分析,得到以下研究結果與主張: 一、社群成員肯定社群具備資源交流與情感支持的功能,透過社群參與,社群成員對IWB之應用從害怕到有自信,社群成員發展出屬於自己應用IWB於數學課堂之「行動可能性」。 二、行動研究循環過程以及參與教師社群促進研究者TPCK專業知能發展。研究者TPCK的發展,第一行動循環以「科技為中心」發展研究者之TPCK;第二行動循環則針對前一循環之回饋進行修正,以「學生為中心」聚焦學生數學學習,促進學生互動與合作學習。能綜合考量學生生活情境、學生數學背景知識、數學學科知識與IWB的特性之間的關係,顯示研究者TPCK有具體正向的發展。 三、本研究的前期,電腦硬體故障頻繁,透過學校行政系統的支援與維修獲得解決。在IWB使用上,未能考量設備的差異,歸因錯誤導致無法順利進行近端書寫、拖曳等動作;所幸經行動研究中的省思與修正,順利的解決。 對未來TPCK相關研究的建議有:以PCK量表為架構發展TPCK量表、進行生手教師TPCK發展相關研究、社群互動應包含專家教師、學科專家與科技專家之連續性討論、全面融入各式資訊科技看TPCK發展之全貌。

並列摘要


Abstract There are three purposes in this research. The first purpose is to record the progress of interaction among six teachers of the teacher community. The second is not only to record how the researcher participate the teachers community but also to record the application of Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) to 27 Elementary school first graders in Mathematics curriculum. The third purpose is to record the difficulties of this study and the solutions to the problems. This research contains two circulations and is carried out by the way of action research that lasts more than one semester. This research is studied mainly by the Qualitative Data, by the means of the Teaching videotape recording, the community of teachers meeting record, the Teaching note. Taking steps suggested by Patton (1990) i.e. to collect the entire primitive data to organize, categorize and then edit for the useful files. After analysis of the research, the findings are as follows: 1. The members in the community of teachers highly approve the functions of the community can support them in the way of teaching resource. Through the community of Teachers participation, the teacher member has the confidence rather than fear in application of the IWB. The teacher members develop their won possibilities in application of the IWB in math class. 2. There are two factors influencing the researcher in TPCK development. They are the progress in the action research and the interaction with the community of teachers. Under the action research, the first circulation based on the means of “technology -center” to develop TPCK of the researcher. The researcher makes adjustments in the second circulation from the feedback of the preceding circulation. In the second circulation, it changes from “technology-center” to “student-center.” “Student-center” focuses on the overall students’ mathematics study and promotes interaction and cooperation among students. The researcher has integrated students’ daily learning environment, students’ mathematics background knowledge, the IWB characteristics and the mathematical content and found that the researcher’s TPCK has positive developments. 3. In the earlier period of this study, the computer hardware had frequently broken down. This problem was solved from the help of the school administration. In the IWB using, the researcher had not considered the equipment's difference and led to the difficulties in dragging and writing. Fortunately, through the reflection and the correction, the upper mentioned problem has solved. There are four suggestions related to the TPCK studies for the future: 1. Based on the PCK scales to develop the TPCK scales. 2. Develop the related research of Novice teacher's TPCK. 3. The community of Teachers interaction should contain the continuity of discussion of the expert teacher, the mathematics content expert and the technology expert. 4. Integrate the multi-type technology and to survey the teacher TPCK development comprehensively.

參考文獻


黃詩雯(2009)。運用Shulman教學推理模式發展國小數學教師PCK歷程之行動 研究。數理學科教學知能,1,65-91。
張世忠、管世應與謝幸芬(2009)。大學生知覺新進教師PCK之個案研究。數理學科教學知能,1,1-20。
周進洋與陳雅智(1999)國中理化教師的行動研究:專業改變與學習社群,科學與教育學報,3,27-51。
林佩璇(2002)。行動研究的知識宣稱~教師實踐知識。國立臺北師範學院學報, 15,189~210。
張世忠與羅慧英(2009)。協同教學對國中學生所知覺的科學教師PCK之影響。 科學教育學刊,17(1),49-68。

被引用紀錄


李柏玲(2012)。實施創意教學在生活領域發展國小教師科技 學科教學知識之個案研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201200427
張湄鈴(2011)。發展一份量表評估國小自然科教師的科技學科教學知識〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201100539
謝麗媛(2011)。國小數學教師使用萬用揭示板發展TPACK之行動研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2011.00217
陳羿伶(2012)。互動式電子白板應用於國小教學對學生學習成效影響之後設分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315294618
王玉蘭(2013)。國小數學教師科技學科教學知識與社會網絡的延展與再思-以重構教學部落格為例〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-0801201418033093

延伸閱讀