透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.235.243.45
  • 學位論文

論後太陽花運動教會參與公共性之「想像」 ─以台灣基督長老教會為例

A Study of the“ Imagination”of Publicity:The Social Action of the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan after the Sunflower Movement

指導教授 : 李信毅 曾慶豹

摘要


本論文以基督徒的視域探討2014年發生太陽花運動後,基督徒如何看待這場運動帶來的「典範轉移」。首先從2008金融危機作為切入點,太陽花運動所反對的《服貿協議》背後,不應只是從馬英九的兩岸經貿政策和其所反對的公民運動、金融危機的分配不均、兩岸關係的台灣主權定位去理解。更應該在後金融危機時代的政經脈絡檢視,各國政府為要解決金融危機造成的政治經濟等社會問題,紛紛以1996年OECD提出以「知識」導向為基礎的「新經濟模式」,推動產業轉型和升級。「知識經濟」將啟動新一波的工業革命,雖能強化國家經濟的競爭力,但此一階段「技術轉型和升級」的過程中,國家之間區域經貿的競合關係,在地緣政治上不免因其各自不同條件或立場(政治的或經濟的)親美或親中。筆者在上述這些問題,以「議題」的方式在這些面向做一個概要式的爬梳,這樣有助於台灣教會的信仰群體認識到「知識經濟」的「典範轉移」,是置於反服貿的「中國因素」概念之優先性。另外,此優先性的討論方式,有助於教會理解太陽花世代因「知識經濟」的技術轉型,所擴大的貧富差距和失業問題,在兩岸區域經貿整合和衝突中,不同的政治制度必然反應在主權的問題上。台灣教會對於政治和社會的關懷,很明顯的表現在台灣基督長老教會。長老教會在1970年代台灣特殊歷史脈絡發表的三大宣言提到的「自決」,為往後長老教會建構了神學理論的基礎,這也反映長老教會必然對太陽花運動遇到政治問題做的表態。本論文從長老教會1970年代三大宣言後,積極參與社會和關注政治提供本土神學的素材,以黃彰輝提出的處境神學在此運動典範轉移的可能性。這個可能性「想像」方式,有別於過去長老教會「上帝的宣教」以「自決」建立的國家認同。是從太陽花運動提出公民不服從的反抗論述,基督徒如何借用文化「公民」的概念出發,在解嚴之後的民主化,長老教會「上帝的宣教」在太陽花世代面對後金融危機的「典範轉移」問題上,嘗試提出一個基督信仰福音關懷的另一種政治論述的整合。

並列摘要


This study is through Christians’ vision to explore how Christians consider the “paradigm shift” after the Sunflower Movement in 2014. First, the finance crisis in 2008 is selected as a turn-in point in this study. Behind the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement, disapproved during the Sunflower Movement, is not supposed to be understood only through the former Taiwanese President Ma Ying-jeou’s cross-strait economic trade policies and citizen movements against the policies, wealth inequality from the finance crisis and the orientation of Taiwan’s sovereignty between the cross-strait relation, but supposed to inspect in the political-economic context after the finance crisis in 2008 that every government after another promotes industry transformation and advancement through “knowledge” orientation-based “new economy modal”, stated by OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) to solve the political, economic and social problems caused after the finance crisis. “Knowledge Economy” will lead to a new industrial revolution. It can improve the competitivity of national economy, however, in the section “transformation and advancement of technology”, the national competition and cooperation relationship of regional economic trade is inevitably (politically or economically) close to the U.S or China because of different conditions or standpoints in terms of geopolitics. The writer will reorganize these aspects of the “issues” conceptually. This can help Taiwanese church fellowship understand that the “paradigm shift” of “knowledge Economy” is prior to the concept of “China factor” against the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement. On the other hand, the priority of the discussion is also able to help the Taiwanese churches understand the Sunflower generation that because of the technological transformation of “Knowledge Economy” and different political institution, the expanded wealth inequality and unemployment must be loomed in the sovereignty issues in the unity and conflict of cross-strait economic trade. Among Taiwanese Churches’ concernment to politics and social issues, the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan is the most obvious. In 1970s, the three main declarations published by the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan stated “Self-determination” to the special Taiwanese historical context. The three main declarations are a basis to build later theological theories of the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan. This also reflects that the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan will certainly expresses the political standpoint in the Sunflower Movement. This thesis will focus on the possibility of paradigm shift in the Sunflower Movement, according to Shoki Coe’s Contextualizing Theology since the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan published the three main declarations and positively participates in social issues, concerning politics to provide materials for indigenous theology. This possible imagination is different from “Misso Dei” in the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan to build national identification through “self-determination”; instead, this is discussion of civil disobedience during the Sunflower Movement, how the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan borrows “Cultural Citizenship” this concept to attempt to express another political discussion from Christian faith concernment to the democratization after Consolidation and to “Misso Dei” on the problems, which the Sunflower generation confronts the “paradigm shift” after the financial crisis.

參考文獻


陳婉琪、黃樹仁,〈立法院外的春吶—太陽花運動靜坐者之人口及參與圖像〉,《台灣社會學》,30期,2015/12,頁141-179。
吳介民、廖美,〈從統獨到中國因素—政治認同變動對投票行為的影響〉,《台灣社會學》,29期,2015/6,頁89-123。
董芳苑,〈論長老教會與台灣的現代化〉,《台灣神學論刊》,17期,1995/3,頁1-36。
謝易宏,〈長老教會莫拉克三周年—踏入民主深化的新歷史階段〉,《新使者》,131期,2012/8,頁52-57。
曾建元,〈民主進步黨執政期間兩岸經濟關係之發展—中華人民共和國對臺經濟戰略之分析〉,《中華行政學報》,第5期,2008/6,頁7-42。

延伸閱讀