中小學教師專業發展評鑑政策形成之研究：多元流程模式分析

張硯凱

44.192.65.228，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

College of Education > Graduate Institute of Education Policy and Administration
Social Sciences > Education

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Search for full text in Holdings

There is no full-text available at the moment. Airiti would like to request author's authorization. I would like to provide authorization.

中小學教師專業發展評鑑政策形成之研究：多元流程模式分析

Policy Making of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development: An Analysis of Multiple Streams

張硯凱 , Masters　　Advisor：潘慧玲　　

繁體中文

中小學教師專業發展評鑑；政策形成；多元流程模式； Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development ； policy making ； Multiple Streams Model

Abstract │ Reference (209) │ Times Cited (3) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

Earlier studies on educational policy in Taiwan usually focused on policy implementation or evaluation, instead of the process of policy making. Concerning the policy of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development, it was put into trial in 2006. The policy is not favored by some interest groups. And a number of researchers are devoted to study the policy. However, mostly concentrate on surveys of policy opinions and comprehension, policy implementation and effects, without paying attention to policy-making process. Hence, the present study aimed to explore the historical background and policy-making process of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development, using the analytical framework of multiple streams. The research methods were semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The concepts of the three stream flows, policy entrepreneur, and policy window were employed to investigate the policy-making process of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development.
The present study concluded the findings as follows:
1.Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development is resulted from the increasing social concerns about students’ education right and teachers’ benefits. The public believe that there is need for a professional evaluation system for teacher in Taiwan.
2.The professional evaluation system for teacher was then proven not feasible. In response to the public opinions, the Ministry of Education in Taiwan on one hand began to deal with relevant public issues and on the other hand tried to promote other teacher evaluation system as an alternative.
3.The establishment of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development is propelled by the international trend of teacher evaluation system, the accomplishment of the first reading of Teacher’s Act draft, regional pilot experiences, and the social expectation for the promotion of teachers’ profession.
4.The variables for policy making of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development includes interaction among different interest groups, least improper influences from political parties, and the dilemma in drafting Teacher’s Act.
5.The development of policy advising for Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development includes four models of change: quantum, emergent, convergence, and gradualist change.
6.The agenda setting and alternatives development for Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development appears two models of change; one is emergent while the other is gradualist change
7.The three streams of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development influence one another during the process and stably evolve into maturity.
8.The policy window of Teacher Evaluation for Professional Development is opened when the stream flows meet one other, because of the long-term efforts of many policy entrepreneurs. In the process, the window has gone through the stages of disappearing and re-appearing.
Suggestions were made to the government, interest groups, incumbent teachers, legistrators, other policies and further researches in the future.

Reference ( 209 ) 〈TOP〉

王玉麟（2004）。研究倫理的相關議題。教師之友，45（2），33-47。
連結：
王麗雲、潘慧玲（2000）。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊，44，173-199。
連結：
丘昌泰（2000）。公共政策。臺北市：巨流。
連結：
江惠真（2008）。教師專業發展評鑑促進學校革新之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系在職進修班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
連結：
宋曜廷、劉俊廷（2007）。教學卷宗在中小學教師專業評鑑的應用：評析NBPTS經驗。教育研究集刊，53，55-86。
連結：

Times Cited (3) 〈TOP〉

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：