透過您的圖書館登入
IP:44.200.210.43
  • 學位論文

同儕對高中生利社會行為之影響:以同理心、友誼特性與同儕相似性為調節角色

Peer influence of high school students’ prosocial behavior: Empathy, friendship features, and peers similarity as a moderator.

指導教授 : 程景琳
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究主要目的欲了解同儕對於高中生之利社會行為的影響,探討高中生好友們利社會行為與其自身利社會行為之間的關係,利社會行為包含三種行為表現,即:關懷、助人、合作行為,同時,以高中生本身同理心(同理關懷、觀點取替)、同儕間友誼特性(友誼品質、互動頻率、友誼持續度)及同儕相似性(社交地位相似性、休閒活動參與相似性),進一步探討同儕利社會行為與自身利社會行為之關係是否具有影響效果。本研究對象為台灣北部地區公立高中一、二年級502位學生(男259人,女243人,平均年齡15.9歲)。使用「利社會行為問卷-同儕提名」、「好朋友提名問卷」、「同理心量表」、「友誼特性量表」、「社交計量問卷-同儕提名」、「休閒活動問卷」等研究工具,分別測量高中生利社會行為、同儕利社會行為、高中生同理心能力、友誼特性、高中生社交地位及活動參與類型。主要研究結果整理如下: 1.同儕利社會行為對於自身利社會行為具有顯著預測力。 2.同理心對同儕利社會行為與自身利社會行為之關係具有調節效果。 3.友誼特性(友誼品質、互動頻率與友誼持續度)對同儕利社會行為與自身利社會行為之關係皆未達顯著調節效果。 4.同儕相似性(社交地位相似性、休閒活動參與相似性)對同儕利社會行為與自身利社會行為之關係皆未達顯著調節效果。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between close friends’ prosocial behavior and adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Three types of behavior representing prosocial behavior were included in this study, i.e., concern, helping, and cooperation. The moderating role of adolescents’ empathy, friendship features, and peer similarity in the relationship between close friends’ prosocial behavior and adolescents’ prosocial behavior was examined. Participants of this study were 502 adolescents (259 boys and 243 girls, mean age = 15.9 years old) in senior high school of three areas in northern Taiwan. Adolescents’ prosocial behavior was assessed by peer nominations. Nominating three close friends were averaged reflect peer influence. The“Prosocial Behavior Nominate Questionnaire”, “Close Friends Nominate Questionnaire”, “The Interpersonal Reactivity Inventory”, “Friendship Features Scale”, “Sociometric Status Nominate Questionnaire”, and “Activity Participation Questionnaire” were used. The main findings were as follows: 1.Close friends’ prosocial behavior significantly predicted adolescents’ prosocial behavior. 2.There were significant in the relationship between close friends’ prosocial behavior and adolescents’ prosocial behavior by adolescents’ empathy. 3.There were no significant in the relationship between close friends’ prosocial behavior and adolescents’ prosocial behavior by friendship features(including friendship quality, interaction frequency, and friendship duration). 4.There were no significant in the relationship between close friends’ prosocial behavior and adolescents’ prosocial behavior by peer similarity(ie. sociometric status similarity, and activity participation similarity).

參考文獻


顏妙桂(2009):服務學習與大學生品德教育之理念與實踐。學習輔導季刊,107,21-36。
謝雨生、吳齊殷、李文傑(2006):青少年網絡特性、互動結構和友誼動態。台灣社會學,11,175-236。
顏肇基、陳姣伶、張召雅、周育如、鍾志從(2005):幼兒利他分享之認知、情感與行為探討。家政教育學報,7,30-54。
黃德祥(2000):青少年發展與輔導。台北:五南。
楊雪華、陳端容、李蘭、柯姍如(2003):雙親和同儕團體對高中生吸菸行為的影響。醫學教育,7,128-139。

被引用紀錄


何瑞芬(2014)。青少年同理心與親子關係滿意度:感恩的中介效果〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840%2fcycu201400546
謝旻晏(2015)。高中職生同理心、自我效能、目標感與利社會行為傾向之相關研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345%2fNTNU202205230
洪偉智(2014)。人際關係愈熱絡愈好嗎? Facebook之實證分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342%2fNTU.2014.10954
呂明哲(2015)。優秀桌球運動員責任感與利社會行為之培育模式〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614020327
陳泓勳(2016)。以社會同理的觀點探究社會運動中警察和群眾的互動與衝突-以318學運為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614065715

延伸閱讀