本研究旨在剖析學生間面對意見衝突時,其小組內部進行協商的情形。基於此一旨趣,本研究首先從社會學、本土心理學、社會計量學等理論的文獻評析,探討小組互動時可能產生的狀況,並將其應用於實徵研究之詮釋上。 本研究對象為30位國一生,每組成員三人,共分10組。以Pontecorvo 與 Girardet所發展出的話語分類指標,將小組討論內容加以歸類統計,並輔以錄音、錄影、學生晤談等等質性資料之收集後,本研究提出以下結論: 一、本研究的小組討論存在有不平等的互動之現象,絕大多數是由高地位 的學生居領導的角色,且多方面的表現均較其他二人傑出,並影響其 小組最終共識之決定。 二、本研究對象的地位是結合學望及人望而成,兩者均對小組互動造成重 大影響力。其中,學望是大多數成員選擇領導者角色及賦予其重任的 主要考慮因素;人望則是會影響到小組討論的氣氛。 三、「少數服從多數」是大部分學生決定共識的準則,此方式雖能快速完 成小組任務,卻未必能真正說服所有的組員。若仔細觀察其互動行 為,可發現到其共識無論是由多數,抑或是少數所決定的,背後的支 持基礎都來自於高地位者的默許同意。 四、一般而言,多數學生排斥自己的意見與他人不同,尤其是低地位者, 因學生們習慣以輸、贏的觀點來看待小組討論中的論辯過程,是以, 當意見與他人不同時,易成為他人攻擊的箭靶,這時,低地位的學生 常採取沉默方式來加以應對。 五、低地位的學生未必一定是小組互動的邊緣人,拒於參與任何協商活 動,只要透過優秀學生的公開讚美..等機會,均能提高其自信心,提 升其學習興趣。
Negotiation between students in a small group is the underlying subject running throughout this study. Drawing upon the theories of sociology, cultural psychology, sociometry, etc. about negotiation and related essays, this thesis explores the situations and problems raised during groups’ resolution of conflict opinions. Thirty seventh-grade students, divided into ten groups of three participated in this study. Each group discussed two issues given by the researcher. The processes of discussion were videoed and audio taped, and then were classified and analyzed according to Pontecorvo and Girardet’s (1993) framework. The major findings are as follows: 1. The present study reveals the asymmetric interaction within the groups. The majority is led by the student with greater leadership capability, who also expressed himself most of the time and drew the final agreement. 2. Both academic and peer statuses directly affected students’ choice to listen. Academic status is the key qualification for members to choose a group leader who dominates the situations, while peer status affects the atmosphere of group discussion. 3.“The decision of the majority” is a common method used by students to reach a final agreement. It is effective but not always persuasive. Nevertheless, an attentive observation reveals that no matter if the final agreement comes from the decision of the minority or the majority, the approval and connivance of the higher status directly influence the outcome. 4. Usually, most of the students reject to have divergent opinions, especially those with an inferior status. That is because they are used to focus on the outcome of the debate. To avoid been attacked if failed, lower status students with inferior complex easily manifest silent responses. 5. Confidence raised by promising students using praise and good comments proves that the lower status students are not necessarily the marginal ones, who refuse to participate in any consultation.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。