國民中學教師教學評鑑規準之研究

A Study of Teacher Performance Evaluation Criteria in Junior High School

李惠淑(Lee Hui Shu)

指導教授 ： 高強華

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育學系在職進修碩士班/碩士(2002年)

摘要

本研究旨在建立一套適用於國民中學教師之教學評鑑規準。首先，為達研究目的，先行收集資料，經由文獻研究加以分析、整理、歸納，以建立概念性規準；其次，再透過二次德懷術專家意見之反覆修訂，界定國中教師教學評鑑規準之相關構面、項目及指標，並發展正式量表對一般教師進行實證調查與分析；最後，綜整與統合專家群與一般教師知覺之重要性、一致性與差異性的看法，以確立本研究所欲建構之規準，提供教師個人、學校及教育主管機關參考。
故在研究方法上，先採用德懷術法，經由二次專家問卷施測（包含18位教育專家人員、教育行政人員與優良教師）之修訂結果為依據編製正式量表，再以問卷調查法，針對北部地區之國民中學一般教師人員，依分層隨機抽樣方式進行實證研究意見調查與分析，樣本包括北部五縣市，74位主任、133位組長與319位教師。研究工具為「國民中學教師教學評鑑規準研究」意見調查表，經回收、統計、處理獲得以下結論：
1. 本研究所建立之「國民中學教師教學評鑑規準」區分5個構面，涵蓋14個項
目，共計56項評鑑指標。
2. 國民中學教師教學評鑑規準各項評鑑構面經專家群與一般教師的統合之意見調查分析後，其重要性及一致性尚稱理想，各評鑑指標尚稱良好。
3.「教學實務與能力」與「班級經營與管理」二構面為評定教師教學評鑑規準之首要層面，亦為專家學者及一般教師較為關注的焦點。
4. 專家群與教師皆認為「極度重要」的指標共合計二十三項。
5. 不同性別、教育程度、學校規模與服務地區之教育人員對「國民中學教學評鑑規準」之看法並無顯著差異。
6. 不同職務、年齡與年資之教育人員對「國民中學教學評鑑規準」之看法有顯著差異，其中職務變項差異性較為顯著。
根據研究結果，本研究分別對教育行政機關、國民中學與一般教師提出多項評鑑實務上的建議與改進意見。

關鍵字

評鑑 ； 教學評鑑 ； 評鑑規準

並列摘要

A Study of Teacher Performance Evaluation Criteria in Junior High School
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to build up a set of standards those are adaptable to the evaluation criteria for teacher performance in the junior high school. To accomplish this purpose, The methodology of this study included a literature review, the Delphi Method and the questionnaire survey. First, based on the related theory and literature, and then review, analyze, and induce them to realize and set up the items and content of the teacher performance evaluation criteria. Second, ask for specialists(expert panel) opinions and ideas on the degree of importance of the evaluation criteria for teacher performance in the junior high school. The result of it demonstrated that evaluation criteria consist 5 evaluation domains, 14 evaluation items and 56 evaluation indicators. Third, developed and edited “Research Questionnaire of Teacher Performance Evaluation Criteria in the Junior High School” to collect and analyze the teachers’ opinions about the evaluation criteria. Questionnaires were delivered to those schools in 5 Northern Taiwan counties and cities【Taipei City, Taipei County, Taoyuan County, Keelung City, and Hsinchu County(City)】. 526 out of the 700 questionnaires sent out were effective. Last, integrated the expert panel and the teachers’ views about the evaluation criteria for teacher performance in the junior high school. The conclusions of this study are as follows:
1. The evaluation criteria for teacher performance in the junior high school consists 5 evaluation domains, 14 evaluation items and 56 indicators.
2. Integrate and analyze the expert panel and the teachers’ views about the 5 evaluation domains, the importance and the degree of the common consensus are ideal, and so are the evaluation indicators.
3. Both the expert panel and the teachers agree “the practice and ability of teaching” and “the class management “ are the most important evaluation domains of all.
4. There are 23 extremely important evaluation indicators both the expert panel and the teachers agree.
5. The teacher’s views about the evaluation criteria for teacher performance in the junior high school don’t have the significant difference with different sex, educational degrees, school scales, and school districts.
6. The teachers’ views about the evaluation criteria for teacher performance in the junior high school have the significant difference with different functional titles, ages, and years of service.
Recommendations and advices based on the conclusions of above research were made for educational authorities, junior high schools, teachers, and for future studies.

並列關鍵字

Evaluation ； Teacher Performance Evaluation ； Evaluation Criteria