桃園縣國民中學教育人員對教師專業發展評鑑實施意見之研究

劉秀滿

3.235.24.113，Hello！

Close
Search Quick Search Advanced Search Publication Search	Personal Service Member Login Searching History Use Bonus Card SYMSKAN
Browse Browse by University of Graduate Thesis Browse by Pinyin of Graduate Thesis Browse by Conference Proceedings Topic Browse by Conference Proceedings Publisher Browse by Pinyin of Conference Proceedings Browse by eBook Category Browse by eBook Topic Browse by eBook Publisher
Customer Services Authorize Airiti Recommend a Journal

Search Symbol (Half-width)	Description of Search Symbols
Space	"AND" indicates the intertwining of key terms used in a search
Double Quotation Marks ("") ( " " )	Double quotation marks indicate the beginning and end of a phrase, and the search will only include terms that appear in the same order of those within the quotations. Example: "image process" ： " image process "
?	Indicates a variable letter. Entering two ? will indicate two variable letters, and so on. Example: "Appl?", search results will yield apple, apply… e , appl y … ( (often used to English word searches) )
*	Indicates an unlimited number of variable letters to follow, from 1~n. Example: Enter "appl*", search results will yield apple, apples, apply, applied, application…(often used in English word searches) e , appl es , appl y , appl ied , appl ication … ( (often used to English word searches) )
AND、OR、NOT	Boolean logic combinations of key words is a skill used to expand or refine search parameters. (1) AND (1) AND: Refines search parameters (2) OR (2) OR: Expands search parameters (3) NOT: Excludes irrelevant parameters

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier （ D igital O bject I dentifier ） ,
and is the unique identifier for objects on the internet. It can be used to create persistent link and to cite articles.

Using DOI as a persistent link

To create a persistent link, add「http://dx.doi.org/」「 http://dx.doi.org/ 」 before a DOI.
For instance, if the DOI of an article is 10.5297/ser.1201.002 , you can link persistently to the article by entering the following link in your browser: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5297/ser.1201.002 。
The DOI link will always direct you to the most updated article page no matter how the publisher changes the document's position, avoiding errors when engaging in important research.

Cite a document with DOI

When citing references, you should also cite the DOI if the article has one. If your citation guideline does not include DOIs, you may cite the DOI link.

DOIs allow accurate citations, improve academic contents connections, and allow users to gain better experience across different platforms. Currently, there are more than 70 million DOIs registered for academic contents. If you want to understand more about DOI, please visit airiti DOI Registration （ doi.airiti.com ）。

Data Source

College of Education > In-service Master's Program, Department of Education
Social Sciences > Education

Bibliography Management Tool

Related Links

Report an Issue

Search in Library

There is no full-text available at the moment. Airiti would like to request author's authorization. I would like to provide authorization.

桃園縣國民中學教育人員對教師專業發展評鑑實施意見之研究

劉秀滿 , Masters　　Advisor：黃純敏博士;許添明博士　　

繁體中文

教師專業發展評鑑；教師評鑑；國民中學； Teacher Professional Development evaluation ； teacher eva1uation ； junior high school

Abstract │ Reference (184) │ Times Cited (11) │ Altmetrics

Abstract 〈TOP〉

Parallel Abstract 〈TOP〉

The substance of this research is to realize the opinions of the teaching staff in 
junior high schools in Taoyuan about 「MOE Subsidy Programs for the experimental 
Teacher Professional Development Evaluation」. Including 10 aspects of the purpose, 
basic concept, applied principles, evaluation organization, evaluation contents, 
evaluation criteria, evaluation methods, evaluation channels, the disposal of the 
evaluation results, evaluation supplementary measures, and the identification of the 
entirety experimental Teacher Professional Development Evaluation. Meanwhile, to 
discuss the support differences of experimental Teacher Professional Development 
Evaluation for the teaching staff in different backgrounds of sex, age, school position, 
teaching years, educational background, and the school scale.
   In order to answer the research questions and achieve the research purpose, this 
research takes the quantitative questionnaire survey as the first and the qualitative
teaching staff interview as the second. The above two research methods are to do the 
empirical study. The researcher takes the hand-out questionnaires 「The survey of the 
Teacher Professional Development Evaluation for the teaching staff in junior high 
schools in Taoyuan」 to Taoyuan county junior high school principals, directors, 
group leaders, homeroom teachers, subject teachers to do the survey research. The 
total distributed questionnaires are 967, and the take back questionnaires are 645. 
(66.7%), the effective questionnaires are 563.(87.3%). The data of the research survey 
is from the SPSS 12.0 for Windows, the computer package software, to find out the 
average, standard deviation, t-test, one-way ANOVA independent samples, and use
Scheffe』 method to do the unplanned comparisons to analyze and discuss the statistics.
And the interview materials to get the follow conclusions :1. Most of the teaching staff agree with the each aspect and the whole opinions about the experimental Teacher Professional Development Evaluation.2. There are some differences in the opinions of the experimental Teacher ProfessionalDevelopment Evaluation in the teaching staff of different background.3.The challenges of facing the controversy of the materials of the testing teacher’s professional development evaluation program.4.Developing the ways of communication of the professional development evaluation program to improve that teachers can get the information of evaluation. 5.The differences of understanding and reflection of the evaluation policy between educators in different positions.6.Predicting positively about the difficulties and solutions when executing the evaluation program 7.Impelling the testing evaluation policy needs to maintain related supplementary measures.

Reference ( 184 ) 〈TOP〉

中華民國師範教育學會（主編）（2007）。教師評鑑與專業成長。台北：心理。
連結：
王麗雲、潘慧玲（2000）。教師彰權益能概念與實施策略研究。教育研究集刊，44，173-200。卯靜儒（2007，10）。美國教師評鑑方案之制度分析—以加州和威州為例。論文發表於國
連結：
朱淑雅（1998）。國民小學教師評鑑效標之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
連結：
何福田、羅瑞玉（1992）。教育改革與教師專業化。載於中華民國師範教育學會主編，教育專業（頁1-30），臺北市。
連結：
吳政達（2002）。國民中小學教師評鑑政策實施之可行性評估。國科會研究計畫成果報告（NSC91）。台北市。
連結：

Times Cited (11) 〈TOP〉

Altmetrics

〈TOP〉

E-mail ：

When an article is available to download, a notice will be sent to your mailbox address.

E-mail ：