水稻強化栽培體系之操作模式可節省水資源並提高水稻產量,但此種操作模式之推廣存在地域性問題。本研究利用土壤不同水分張力情境探討水稻之灌溉水量,並於國立屏東科技大學之試驗區及嘉南農田水利會灌溉推廣中心進行田區進行實驗,探討漫灌與紋溝灌溉對水稻種植之需水量、農藝性狀及產量影響。 本研究在國立屏東科技大學試驗區以水稻在30 kPa、40 kPa、50 kPa、60 kPa、70 kPa、80 kPa等6種土壤水分張力條件下,進行灌溉調整試驗。試驗結果顯示,土壤水分張力在30 kPa之灌溉量比80 kPa多 2.963 %,但產量30 kPa比80 kPa多14.230 %。在嘉南農田水利會灌溉推廣中心之試驗區所進行的紋溝灌溉與漫灌之灌溉水量控制為土壤水分張力達40 kPa時再灌溉,每次灌溉水深為2 cm。而由試驗結果之農藝性狀綜合分析顯示,紋溝兩側之水稻之成長率、稔實率及稻穀重量皆較漫灌為佳,全區水稻產量比較結果顯示紋溝灌溉較漫灌多。
T The operation of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) can save water and increase rice yield, however, the promotion of SRI operation is exist regional issues. This study used different soil water tension to investigate water demand, rice agronomic traits and rice yield for both rill irrigation and flooding irrigation. The field tests were carried out at National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (NPUST) and Chia-Nan Irrigation Association Guidance Service Office (CNIAGSO). At NPUST experiment site, soil water tensions had 6 conditions including 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 kPa to carry out irrigation adjustment test. The result shown the amounts of irrigation water was 2.963% more for soil water tension at 30 kPa than 80 kPa. But rice yield had 14.23% more at 30 kPa than at 80 kPa. The water irrigation for field tests at CNIAGSO were controlled at soil water tension reached 40 kPa both flooding irrigation and rill irrigation and each time the irrigation water was controlled at water depth 2 cm. Results from the comprehensive analysis of rice agronomic traits showed that the rice growth rate, rice grain, and rice weight at both sides of the ditch for rill irrigation had better than flooding irrigation. The comparison of rice yield at full site showed rice grain yield with rill irrigation was more than with the flooding irrigation.
為了持續優化網站功能與使用者體驗,本網站將Cookies分析技術用於網站營運、分析和個人化服務之目的。
若您繼續瀏覽本網站,即表示您同意本網站使用Cookies。