透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.58.112.1
  • 學位論文

虛設行號查緝之研究- 以財政部臺灣省中區國稅局查核案件為例

A Study of Fictitious Company Seizing -- An Example as the Check Case of National Tax Administration of Central Taiwan Province, Ministry of Finance

指導教授 : 謝俊宏
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文目的在建構一區別虛設行號營業人之預測模式,鑑於此,研究資料以財政部臺灣省中區國稅局(以下簡稱中區國稅局)於97年6月聯合臺灣彰化地方法院檢察署、彰化縣警察局員林分局共同破獲之饒玉鱗虛設行號集團,轄屬中區國稅局之營業人為樣本,藉由觀察該等營業人每期營業稅申報資料,運用Logit迴歸分析、區別分析找出判別虛設行號之特徵因子,分別建立預測模式。 實證結果顯示,營業人申報加值率、營業稅申報期數、取得進項發票張數、平均每張進項發票金額等變項,為判別營業人是否為虛設行號之顯著因素,並建立了兩分類模式,實證顯示,邏輯斯分析、區別分析的預判率分別達到100%、99%,此模式有助於稽徵機關及早掌握虛設行號營業人不法行為,節省稽徵人力,有效達到遏止逃漏之目的。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to construct the prediction model for discriminating the fictitious company. In view of this, the sample data was selected from the fictitious companies in the National Tax Administration of Central Taiwan Province, Ministry of Finance (hereinafter referred to as Central National Tax Bureau) that Central National Tax Bureau jointed Changhua District Prosecutors Office and Yuanlin Branch of Changhua County Police Headquarter to uncover Rao Yu-Lin Fictitious Company group commonly on June, 2008. According to the observation of fictitious companies’ each transaction tax(business profit tax or sales tax) declaration data, and use logistic regression model and discriminant analysis model to find out the characteristic factors of fictitious company judgment for constructing predictive models each other. As the empirical results, some variables of fictitious company would be the significant factors to judge whether the business person is fictitious company or not, such as added-value tax declaration, business tax declaration terms, income invoice quantities acquirement and each income invoice amount average, and then construct two kinds classification models. The empirical results showed that the correct classify rate of logistic Regression model and discriminant analysis model are reached to 100% and 99%. These models will help National Tax Administration to monitor fictitious companies’ illegalities early and save audit manpower to accomplish the purpose of tax evasion preventive effectively.

參考文獻


賴志鏹(2005)。虛設行號案件調查蒐證之研究。私立中原大學財經法律學系碩士論文。未出版,桃園。
孫鑑吾(2009)。營業登記與稅籍管理-廢止營利事業統一發證制度後適用講義。未出版,台中。
黃劭彥、吳東憲、紀怡如(2009)。企業網站環境會計資訊揭露影響因素之研究。會計與公司治理,第6卷,第一期。
陳正芬(2005)。利用未償債務之扣除進行逃漏遺產稅之研究-Logit模式之運用。Chiao Da Mangement Review Vol.25。
黃傳益(2008)。使用資料探勘技術於稅務資料中判斷虛設行號之研究。國立成功大學工程科學研究所碩士論文。未出版,台南。

被引用紀錄


王杉進(2011)。運用層級分析法及主成份分析法探討虛設行號特徵因子之研究〔碩士論文,國立虎尾科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0028-1706201111493200
張春蓮(2013)。加值型營業稅逃漏偵測之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺中科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0061-0806201316360600
游崇熙(2014)。加值型營業稅選案研究 -以財政部中區國稅局某稽徵所為例〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2611201410183721

延伸閱讀