透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.42.168
  • 期刊

私募基金管理初探-從美國法觀察台灣制度之發展

A Preliminary Examination of Private Fund Regulation-Observing Taiwan's System through American Lens

摘要


由於外國私募基金在台灣的證券市場已有一定之參與,甚至已有取得上市公司經營權的案例,而使得政府對私募基金的管理相當重視。其實,各國對私募基金均極關切。理由在於,第一是1988年長期資本管理(LTCM)私募基金的垮台,引起全球金融界的緊張,主要是其投資全球金融工具的資產規模龐大,以及其與銀行界錯綜複雜的交易與投資關係;其二是私募基金近來在國際股市從事大規模購併行動,而使得各國政府對此產生警覺,擔心影響國內經濟結構;其三是私募基金本身欠缺透明性,使得它在神秘面紗的覆蓋下,讓市場參與者懷疑其行為是否有逾越法律的規範;其四是越來越多的投資人購買私募基金,因此使得管理機關思考強化對私募基金的管理以保護投資人。本上所述,本文首在介紹私募基金的發源地與最活躍的國家-美國,其近年來對私募基金的管理與實務之發展。其次介紹台灣的現行制度的利弊得失,參酌美國制度,提供未來修訂法規時應省思的議題與方向。

並列摘要


Foreign private funds have invested in Taiwan's stock markets for a quite time, some of which have had control over listed companies. Thus, Taiwan's government is concerned about the impact that private funds have brought. In fact, authorities around the globe are focusing on private funds. The reasons are clear. First, the collapse of LTCM in 1988 had almost created an international financial crisis. LTCM had enormous assets and invested globally, and it had complex investment and trading relationships and networks with financial institutions. Second, some nations are nervous about recent cross-border acquisition activities by international private funds. They fear these activities might change domestic economic structures. Third, private funds themselves lack of transparency and they act mysteriously, which let outsiders suspicious of overstepping the legal boundary. Fourth, there are more and more investors putting money in private funds, so that the authorities have to design a workable regulatory scheme to protect those investors. Hence, this paper will introduce the recent development of U.S. legal environment for private funds. After all, the U.S. is the most active private fund playground in the world. Then the paper would pay attention to Taiwan's private fund regulation. Pros and cons of private funds will be highly emphasized with actual cases, and comparative law approach is used to identify legal issues. I expect the issues this paper raised can help Taiwan's authorities to facilitate their regulatory agenda on private funds.

參考文獻


易明秋(2006)。論證券市場再次發行之管理。東吳法律學報。18,91-127。
National Archives and Records Administration.(Federal Register).
(1999).Report of The President`s Working Group on Financial Markets, Hedge Funds.(Leverage, and the Lessons of Long-Term Capital Management).
(2003).Staff Report to the SEC.(Implications of the Growth of Hedge Funds).
(2007).WalkerWorking Group.(Guidelines for Disclosure and Transparency in Private Equity).

被引用紀錄


蔡耀霆(2014)。台灣私募股權基金的未來發展契機〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.10345
王芸廷(2014)。私募股權投資基金籌資法制之比較研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.10340
黃于軒(2013)。論私募股權基金之金融監理-以投資策略可能引發之風險為探討中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01967
李佳芳(2009)。管制私募股權基金之研究-以投資人保護及資本市場管理為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.10541
江俊逸(2009)。私募股權基金之探討〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1111200915521487

延伸閱讀