心理師能力評量表之編製及其信效度分析

The Construction, Reliability and Validity Study of Psychologist Competency Rating Scale

林家興(Chia-Hsin Lin) ； 林旻沛(Min-Pei Lin) ； 黃佩娟(Pei-Chuan Huang) ； 胡薇瑄(Wei-Hsuan Hu) ； 江信男(Shan-Nan Jiang)

《教育心理學報》 47卷1期 (2015/09) Pp. 63-86

https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20141008

摘要

在心理師能力本位的國際潮流下，國內心理師培育系所和實習機構督導缺少一份實用且具信效度的能力評量表；本研究主要目的在於編製一份有助於評量全科心理師專業能力的評量表，作為心理師教育工作者、臨床督導，以及個別心理師作為評量專業能力發展的客觀工具。本研究以林家興與黃佩娟（2013）發展的心理師能力指標作為編製心理師能力評量表的藍本，以不同專業發展階段的諮商和臨床心理師（含實習心理師）297人為研究對象。研究結果顯示，心理師能力評量表全量表及各分量表內部一致性係數皆大於.93，且根據結構方程模式考驗量表的建構效度，顯示量表之六個因素整體模式適配度佳，心理師能力架構和內涵包括：衡鑑診斷與概念化能力、介入能力、諮詢能力、研究與評鑑能力、督導能力及管理能力等六向度；群組分數差異分析顯示，在心理師能力的六個向度上，性別沒有顯著差異，但博士層級和碩士層級兩組，以及高低執業年資兩組都有顯著差異。本研究並建立百分等級常模作為分數解釋和應用的依據。研究者根據研究結果提出實務應用和未來研究建議。

關鍵字

心理師能力評量表 ； 能力指標 ； 諮商心理師 ； 臨床心理師

並列摘要

Under the global trend of competence-based approach to the training of psychologists, there is a lack of a feasible, valid, and reliable competency rating scale among psychologist training institutes in Taiwan. The purpose of the study was to construct an objective rating scale to be used in assessing general psychologist's professional competencies by educators, clinical supervisors, and psychologists themselves. The rating scale was based on competency benchmarks developed by Lin and Huang (2013), and was constructed and used as the research instrument. A total of 297 counseling and clinical psychologists (including psychology interns) in various developmental stages were recruited as research participants. The results of the study showed that the scale has a high level of internal consistency as indicated by full scale's and subscales' alphas being greater than .93. A structural equation modeling analysis was conducted to test the construct validity of the scale. The six-factor model was found to be a good fit. The scale is comprised of six competences: assessment, diagnosis, and conceptualization; intervention; consultation; research and evaluation; supervision; and management. The study also showed that there were significant mean differences on the full scale and 6 subscales scores between doctoral level and master's level psychologists; and between senior and junior psychologists. This result indicated that the scale has a good differential validity. Percentile rank norms were established for easy interpretation of the scores. Suggestions for practical applications and future study based on the current study results were also presented.

並列關鍵字

clinical psychologist ； competency benchmark ； counseling psychologist ； psychologist competency rating scale

參考文獻

賀孝銘、吳秀碧、張德榮、林清文、林杏足（2001）：諮商員個案概念化之能力結構與評量表之編製研究。彰化師大輔導學報，22，193-230。[Ho, H. M., Woo, S. P., Chang, T. J., Lin, C. W., & Lin, S. J. (2001). The development of counselor conceptualization inventory. The Archive of Guidance & Counseling, 22, 193-230.]

吳秀碧、許育光（2012）：團體領導能力量表之編製與信效度建構。中華輔導與諮商學報，32，1-31。[Woo, S. P., & Hsu, Y. K. (2012). Development of the group leadership competence sca. Chinese Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 32, 1-31.]

徐西森（2005）：SAS取向諮商督導能力評量表之編製研究。中華輔導學報，18，153-202。[Shyu, S. S. (2005). The development of a SAS-oriented supervisory competence scale. Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling, 18, 153-202.]

田秀蘭、陳淑琦、劉玲君、王櫻芬（2003）：兒童團體輔導能力的內涵與評量研究。中華輔導學報，14，89-116。[Tien, H. L., Chen, S. C., Wang, Y. F., & Liu, L. C. (2003). The training and evaluation for children’s group counseling competencies. Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling, 14, 89-116.]

林美珠（2002）：諮詢能力內涵與評量之探討研究。中華輔導學報，12，117-152。[Lin, M. J. (2002). An empirical study on consultation competency and measurement. Chinese Annual Report of Guidance and Counseling, 12, 117-152.]