試論休閒研究的典範

An Exploration of the Paradigms of Leisure Studies

李明宗(Ming-Chung Lee)

《戶外遊憩研究》 14卷3期 (2001/09) Pp. 1-13

https://doi.org/10.6130/JORS.2001.14(3)1

摘要

本文由科學哲學及知識社會學的觀點，探討休閒研究的典範。休閒具有「個人．自由∕結構．限制」吊詭的兩面性。休閒研究在世界觀的層面可分爲詮釋模式、功能模式與衝突模式取徑，在方法論的層面，可分爲偏向實證論的定量研究及偏向詮釋論的定性研究。吾人可預期在最近的將來休閒研究將朝多元典範發展。

關鍵字

休閒研究 ； 典範 ； 自由與限制 ； 個人與結構

並列摘要

This paper discussed the ”Leisure Studies” from the perspective of Philosophy of Science and Sociology of Knowledge. Leisure is a paradoxical process of ”individual. freedom/ structure. constraint”. On the level of world view, there are Interpretative, Positivist and Conflict paradigms. However, on the methodological level, there are qualitative and quantitative approaches. We are expecting the emergence of multiparadigms of Leisure Studies in the near future.

並列關鍵字

Leisure Studies ； Paradigm ； Freedomand Constraint ； Individual and Structure

參考文獻

(1989).Freedom and constraint: The paradoxes of leisure. Ten years of the Leisure Studies Association.London:Routledge.

Giddens, A.(1971).Capitalism and modern social theory.Cambridge, London:Routledge.

Habermas, J.(1972).Knowledge and human interest.London:Heineman.

Henderson, K. A.(1990).Leisure science, dominant paradigm, and philosophy: An introduction.Journal of Leisure Research.22(4)

Henderson, K. A.(1991).Dimension of choice: A qualitative approach to recreation, parks and leisure.State College, PA:Venture Publishing.