透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.243.184
  • 期刊

從深度休閒理論探討太魯閣國家公園解說志工對解說服務之投入程度與其深度休閒特質之關係

Applying Serious Leisure Theory to Explore the Relationship between Leisure Involvement and Serious Leisure Characteristics of Voluntary Interpreters

摘要


本研究以Stebbins(2001)之深度休閒理論(Serious Leisure)爲基礎,驗證國家公園解說志工在深度休閒特質與休閒投入程度間之關係。本研究以太魯閣國家公園之解說志工爲母體,進行郵寄問卷調查。調查共回收144份有效問春,回收率接近41%。研究結果顯示,27項深度休閒特質經主成份分析後明確地可分成六個構面,與Stebbins所提出的六項深度休閒特質吻合,分別是參與解說服務之個人利益、不屈不撓的精神、獨特之價值觀、認同感、生涯發展、及個人努力,因此可證實本研究所提出的深度休閒量表在效度與信度上的可行性。此外,本研究進一步地分析發現解說志工深度休閒特質與休閒投入程度間的顯著關係,即獨特之價值觀、生涯發展、及參與解說之個人利益等三項深度休閒特質會因志工之服勤次數、參與服勤天數、帶隊解說次數、年資、運用解說技巧熟練度、以及是否擁有很多國家公園及解說相關書籍子休閒投入變項之不同而呈現顯著差異。

並列摘要


The objective of this study was to apply serious leisure theory to voluntary interpreters in Taroko National Park. This study was based on the serious leisure characteristics from Stebbins (2001) and explored the relationship between leisure involvement and serious leisure characteristics of voluntary interpreters. This study investigated voluntary interpreters in Taroko National Park by a mailed questionnaire and a total of 144 valid questionnaires were received. The results showed that the 27 serious leisure characteristics were reduced into exactly 6 factors which Stebbins has suggested, including 'personal benefit derived from interpretation service', 'perseverance', 'unique ethos', 'identification', 'career development' and 'personal effort'. And this study also found that there are significant differences between serious leisure characteristics and leisure involvement. Participation frequencies and days, years of service, interpretation techniques, and owning national park related books were significantly related to different serious leisure characteristics.

參考文獻


劉虹伶(2005)。深度休閒者之休閒效益。大專體育。78,116-122。
顏伽如、林禹良(2003)。將終身學習當作認真休閒。大專體育。65,90-95。
林佑瑾、李英弘、葉源鎰(2004)。認真性休閒與休閒阻礙關係之研究:以高爾夫運動者為例。戶外遊憩研究。17(3),17-29。
黃文卿、林晏州(2003)。玉山國家公園管理處人員與志工之參與動機與對組織認同感之研究。戶外遊憩研究。16(4),1-18。
Bussell, H.,Forbes, D.(2003).Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering.International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing.7(3),244-257.

被引用紀錄


莊御祥(2014)。自行車休閒活動者認真休閒、流暢體驗與休閒滿意度之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.00122
楊筑鈞、謝百淇(2022)。國家公園解說志工的生態認同之初探科學教育學刊30(2),171-192。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.202206_30(2).0004
廖文琴(2010)。學校志工認真休閒特質與休閒效益之關係〔碩士論文,亞洲大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0118-1511201215464181
陳書為(2010)。台北市市民運動中心消費者轉換行為意圖之研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-0601201112113201
蕭佳賓(2012)。深度休閒者知識獲取行為模式之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315264514

延伸閱讀