透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.220.154.41
  • 期刊

論牟宗三與唐君毅「儒家形上學」詮釋視域較析

Comparative Analysis of the Interpretation of the Viewdomain of Mu Zongsan and Tang Junyi's "Confucian Metaphysics"

摘要


牟宗三先生強調藉具體之生命之普遍意義以體證天道之存在,並進而解釋一切天地萬物之存在,其並非以形上學之理論由上而下建立道德、論述道德意義與價值;而是藉由下學上達,確立其儒家形上學。唐君毅先生則是依儒家性情之教為進路,依自我性情之感通上達於人我感通、物我相融、天人合德之境。肯定人人皆有一無限而至善的心之本體,並據此生命心靈主動之情自覺,進而感通他人與世界。總結兩位先生詮釋視域可就三點說明:「良知之逆覺」與「性情之感通」、「圓教圓善」與「心通九境」、「即道德即宗教」與「一學一教之道」。

並列摘要


Mr. Mou Zongsan emphasized that by virtue of the universal significance of specific life to prove the existence of heaven and earth, and then to explain the existence of all things in heaven and earth, it is not by the theory of metaphysics from the top down to establish morality, the discussion of moral significance and value; Mr. Tang Junyi is based on Confucian nature teaching for the road, according to the feeling of self-nature to reach the human I feel, things I melt, heaven and man of the land of virtue. Affirm that everyone has an infinite and kind heart, and according to the initiative of life and mind self-awareness, and then feel the other people and the world. Summarizing the two gentlemen's interpretation of the similarities and differences in the field of vision can be explained in three points: "the counter perception of conscience" and "the sense of temperament", "the circle of religion" and "the nine realms of the heart", "that is, morality is religion" and "one learning, one teaching way".

參考文獻


牟宗三,《中國哲學十九講》,臺北:臺灣學生書局,2015。
牟宗三,《中國哲學的特質》,臺北:臺灣學生書局,2015。
牟宗三,《心體與性體》,臺北:正中書局,2012。
牟宗三,《生命的學問》,臺北:三民書局,2015。
牟宗三,《牟宗三先生晚期文集》,臺北:聯經出版事業公司,2003。

延伸閱讀