詮莊與反莊：李磎〈廣廢莊論〉中的莊學詮釋與批判

Interpretation and Opposition to "Zhuangzi": The Interpretation and Criticism of "Zhuangzi" in Li Qi's "Explication of Feizhuanglun"

林明照(Ming-Chao Lin)

《中國學術年刊》 33_2期 (2011/09) Pp. 35-65

https://doi.org/10.6238/SIS.201109_(33-2).0002

摘要

李磎為晚唐儒者，著作甚豐，其在莊學方面則有一篇〈廣廢莊論〉之作。該文雖以擴充及深化東晉王坦之〈廢莊論〉為題，實則以闡發自身對於莊子思想的詮解及批評為主。李磎的反莊之論，一方面嘗試批評莊子的思維謬誤，同時針對莊子哲學思想的若干主題進行闡論及批評。本文一方面將分析李磎對於莊子思想的詮解以及其反莊的理路；同時也將呈現李磎莊學詮釋的思想背景，包括與荀學、玄學的關係，以及與晚唐儒學之間的聯繫。

關鍵字

李磎 ； 莊子 ； 反莊 ； 荀子 ； 玄學 ； 晚唐

並列摘要

Li Qi, a Confucian in late Tang Dynasty, is abundant in writings, one of which is about ”Zhuangzi” called ”Explication of Feizhuanglun.” As the title indicates, the article tries to explicate ”Feizhuanglun” of Wang Tanzhi in Jin Dynasty, but actually it's mainly Li Qi's authentic interpretation and criticism of the thought of Zhuangzi. His argument against Zhuangzi goes in two ways; he criticizes the logic in Zhuangzi's thought first, and at the same time he also presents his own interpretation and criticism on certain topics in ”Zhuangzi”. As a result, this paper will not only focus on the analyses of Li Qi's interpretation and his argument against Zhuangzi but also try to present Li Qi's thinking background behind his interpretation, including the relation to the thought of Xunzi and metaphysics in Weijin Period as well as the relationship between Confucians in late Tang Dynasty.

並列關鍵字

Li Qi ； Zhuangzi ； opposition to Zhuangzi ； Xunzi ； metaphysics in Weijin Period ； late Tang Dynasty

參考文獻

周大興(2001)。王坦之〈廢莊論〉的反莊思想︰從玄學與反玄學、莊學與反莊學的互動談起。中國文哲研究集刊。18，316。

唐白居易(2004)。白居易集。台北:鼎淵文化。

唐皮日休(1981)。皮子文藪。上海:上海古籍出版社。

唐柳宗元(1982)。柳宗元集。台北:漢京文化事業。

唐劉禹錫(1999)。劉禹錫集。上海:上海古籍出版社。