透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.149.229.253
  • 期刊

全球化與社會政策的未來:德國“新中間”路線之爭議

Globalization and the Future of Social Policy: Controversies over the German "New Middle"

摘要


全球化雖未使民族主義沒落,但民族國家面臨日益強大的各種跨國勢力,其功能則確已式微。而約束資本主義的兩大制度-民主政治與社會福利(亦即平衡資本主義與社會正義的兩大前提),至今仍只能在民族國家的框架中施行。隨著民族國家在跨國經濟勢力衝擊下功能的式微,民主政治與社會福利的基礎也可能為經濟全球化所動搖。在新自由主義的全球主義看來,市場法則原本就應該是社會運作的唯一法則。反對此種「解政治化」趨勢的人士,則試圖一方面透過跨國合作,在全球範圍內重新約束資本主義;一方面透過國內改革,因應不可逆轉的全球化潮流。德國社會民主黨人亦瞭解面對不可逆轉的全球化,必須變革以為因應。德國對於跨國政治架構的建立頗為支持;但在執政的社民黨內部,則出現較接近新自由主義的「新中間」路線與較接近傳統社會民主觀點的社民黨左翼間的衝突。爭執的主要問題即在於:在經濟全球化的時代,社會正義應如何維持?

並列摘要


Globalization causes the decline of functions of nation-state-although the declining of state's function is not equal to the declining of nationalism. The premises of a balance between capitalism and social justice, democracy and social policy, are still carried out in the frame of nation-state so far. With the declension of the nation-state in relation to transnational economic power, the foundation of democracy politics and social welfare is shaken by the economic globalization. Neo-liberalism-globalism thus claims the law of market should be the only law of social operating. Those who are against this kind of ”depolitical” trends try to re-regulate capitalism on the global scale through transnational cooperation, and make the states to response the no returning globalization trends through intra-national reform. Germany has a great interest in the establishment of transnational politics; but within the German socialdemocrats (SPD) there are conflicts between ”The New Middle”, which is close to neo-liberalism, and the left wing of the SPD, which is close to traditional socialdemocracy. The point of issue: how could the social justice be assured under trends of globalization?

參考文獻


(1998).Nichts tun geht nicht.Der Spiegel.46
(1998).Oskar of Werbetour.Der Spiegel.47
(1998).Lust am Widerstand.Der Spiegel.47
(1999).Vielleicht ein bischen ruhiger.Der Spiegel.11
(1999).Freie Hand fur den Kanzler.Der Spiegel.11

被引用紀錄


邢光愷(2013)。美國總統選舉戰略研究(1980-2008)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2013.00829
松柏陵(2008)。論經濟全球化下德國施若德政府對萊茵模式的改革與其成效評估〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00285
林婉萍(2010)。福利國家對新自由主義的回應—以荷蘭為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.01378
陳俊玄(2009)。台灣博奕資本主義發展辯證關係之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315165259
王俊人(2010)。全球化與區域統合下之憲法新秩序:我國的挑戰與回應〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315205074

延伸閱讀