透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.21.93.44
  • 期刊

Are Bank Capital Buffers Cyclical? Evidence of Developed and Developing Countries

銀行資本緩衝是否有景氣循環現象?已開發國家和開發中國家之實證研究

摘要


本文探討資本緩衝和景氣循環間的關係。1995至2009年全球銀行樣本顯示資本和普通股權益緩衝具順景氣循環現象,大型銀行和銀行控股公司在已開發國家和以市場為基礎的金融體系具順景氣循環的資本緩衝和抗景氣循環的普通股權益緩衝,傾向增加第二類資本以提高資本適足率。結果支持金融危機後巴塞爾協議III的抗景氣循環資本緩衝措施。

並列摘要


This study examines the relationship between capital buffers and business cycle fluctuations. The results show procyclicality in both capital and common equity buffers in banks of 171 countries from 1995 to 2009. Large banks and bank holding companies in developed countries and market-based financial systems have procyclical capital buffers and countercyclical common equity buffers. These banks tend to raise Tier 2 capital to improve their capital ratio. The results of the empirical evidence are consistent with the procyclicality phenomenon that occurred in the 2008 financial crisis, and supports the Basel III requirements for countercyclical capital buffer.

參考文獻


Bikker, Jaap, and Paul Metzemakers, 2005, Is bank capital pro-cyclical? A crosscountry analysis, Working paper
Borio, Claudio, Craig Furfine, and Philip Lowe, 2001, Procyclicality of the financial system and the financial stability: Issues and policy options, Working paper
Demirguc-Kunt, Asli, and Ross Levine, 1999, Bank-based and market-based financial systems: Cross-country comparisons, Working paper
Jackson, Patricia, 1999, Capital requirements and bank behaviour: The impact of the Basel accord, Working paper
Milne, Alistair, and Elizabeth Whalley, 2001, Bank capital regulation and incentives for risk-taking, Working paper

被引用紀錄


柯沛杉(2012)。探討資本緩衝、放款與景氣循環之關係 ―以台灣地區銀行為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2806201216392800

延伸閱讀