透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.145.8.42
  • 期刊

婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究

The Study of Typology among Intimate Abusers

摘要


國外之研究均指出婚姻暴力加害人不是一同質性之團體,而國內之實際案例亦有如此 發現。本研究之目的即在了解台灣地區婚姻暴力加害人之可能分類及其與致命危險間之相關。研究樣本以高雄縣市家庭暴力防治中心所接受之婚姻暴力案件為來源,委請接案之社會工作人員就受害婦女收集其「危險評估量表(Danger Assessment, DA)」、「簡易衝突行為量表(Brief Conflict Tactics Scale, CTS)、及研究者設計之「婚姻暴力被害婦女問卷」。本研究共收集有121 個有效樣本,以DA量表之結果做群集分析發現婚姻暴力加害人可區分為四類,即低暴力型(佔53.6%)、酗酒高致命型(佔20.5%)、高暴力高控制型(佔21.4%)、及邊緣高控制型(佔4.5%),而其中有九位無法分類。四類婚姻暴力加害人在CTS之暴力量、致命暴力次數、及DA量表總分均至少有一對達顯著差異。而在年齡、教育程度、及有無職業,均無法達到顯著差異。本研究之優缺點及日後建議亦在文中有所討論。

並列摘要


All foreign studies showed that intimate violence offenders is not a homogeneous group, which is also found true among the real cases in Taiwan. The purpose of this study was to explore the typology of intimate abusers and the lethal risk among them. Intimate abuse cases in Kaohsiung City and County during one month period were selected as sample in this study. The abused females in the sample were administrated the Danger Assessment, the Brief Conflict Tactics Scale, and a questionnaire by the social workers. 121 samples were collected in this study. There were four types of intimate abusers identified by cluster analysis through 15 items in DA. They were low-violent (53.6%), alcoholism-lethal (20.5%), high - violent-high-control (21.4%), , borderline-high-control (4.5%) abusers. It were found that at least one pair among four types reached significant difference in the CTS totals, the times of lethal violence, and the DA total. However, the ages, the educational level, and employment status among them were not reached significant difference. The advantages and disadvantages of this study, and the suggestion for future study were discussed.

參考文獻


林明傑、沈勝昂(2003)。台灣地區婚姻暴力加害人之危險評估:DA量表在台灣地區適用之研究。犯罪學期刊。6(2),177-216。
陳若璋(1992)。臺灣婚姻暴力之本質-歷程與影響。婦女與兩性學刊。3,117-147。
American Psychiatric Association(1994).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) Washington, Dc: Author.精神疾病診斷準則手冊.
American Psychiatric Association(1994).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) Washington, Dc: Author.精神疾病診斷準則手冊,孔繁鐘譯.
Campbell, J.C.(2000).(Issues in risk assessment in the field of intimate partner violence).

被引用紀錄


陳敏菡(2022)。從事家庭暴力相對人處遇網絡之心理師跨域合作及困境探究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2022.00309
林冠惟(2015)。男性家暴相對人在父權體制下的性別角色〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2015.00214
蘇麗卿(2009)。婚姻暴力加害人接受處遇計畫之主觀經驗研究 —以參加認知輔導教育團體後為例〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2009.00069
王茲繐(2008)。婚姻暴力加害人處遇方案對於加害人家庭系統影響之探討〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2008.00496
范世玲(2008)。大專女學生對約會暴力容忍度及影響因素之研究—以台北某商業技術學院為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2901200811135700

延伸閱讀