透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.116.118.198
  • 期刊

青少年憂鬱情緒與多元風險因子:個別效果與累積效果的驗證

Adolescent Depressive Mood and Multiple Risk Factors: A Test of Individual and Cumulative Effects

摘要


研究目的:根據生態系統理論,青少年憂鬱情緒的風險因子多方面地散佈在環境中。過去的文獻除了探討個別風險因子對憂鬱情緒的解釋力外,也以累積風險指標來探究累積效果以及扣板機效應。本研究以性別、家庭經濟壓力、親子衝突、負向同儕關係以及學業期望壓力作為憂鬱情緒的風險因子,除檢視個別效果外,也以累積風險指標來驗證累積效果。研究方法:本研究對象為台灣地區就讀於高中、高職、五專一至三年級、18歲以下的青少年。經多階段叢集抽樣後,共有1,307位青少年參與團體問卷施測。考量資料的完整性,故僅針對填答完整者(N=1,196),以交叉表分析、單因子變異數分析、趨勢分析、多元邏輯迴歸及多元線性迴歸來驗證研究假設。研究結果:多元線性迴歸分析指出家庭經濟壓力、親子衝突、負向同儕關係以及學業期望壓力越高者,其憂鬱情緒得分越高。本研究也證實了風險因子具有累積效果,但扣板機效應僅展現在以累積風險指標來預測個體是否有罹患憂鬱症的風險時。研究結論:由於危險因子具有累積效果,本研究建議心理衛生專業應進行系統性的風險因子評估,並針對面臨多元風險因子的青少年進行密集性的介入協助。

並列摘要


Purpose: The ecological system model posits that the depressogenic risk factors that exist in a person's ecosystem exert a negative impact on an individual's mental health. Previous researchers have also proposed analysis of the cumulative effects of individual factors in order to better capture the impact of a cluster of risk factors. This study investigated the association between depressive mood and a group of risk factors that are known to be salient among adolescents in Taiwan. The risk factors investigated included gender, family economic stress, parent-adolescent conflict, negative peer relationships, and academic expectation stress. The cumulative risk index was used as a proxy for investigating the impact of multiple risk factors. Method: A multi-stage cluster sampling method was used to select respondents. Self-report questionnaires were completed by 1,307 students in high schools, vocational high schools, and junior colleges, but only 1,196 questionnaires with complete answers were entered into statistical analyses. Cross-tabulation, oneway ANOVA, trend analysis, Pearson correlation, hierarchical linear regression models, and multiple logistic regressions were used to test the hypotheses of individual and cumulative effects. Results: The linear regression analyses indicated that each risk factor was a significant predictor of the adolescents' depressive mood. Although the hypothesis of cumulative effects was verified, the findings on the triggering effect varied with the analytical approach. Conclusions: Given the evidence for cumulative effects of multiple risk factors, mental health professionals need to use the ecological perspective in assessing depressogenic risk factors and designing intensive services to address multiple risk factors.

參考文獻


吳治勳、吳英璋、許文耀、蕭仁釗(2008)。台灣兒童及青少年關係量表(TRICA)之編製和心理計量特性研究。測驗學刊。55(3),535-557。
魏琦芳(2008)。青少年心理健康的影響因素─貫時性研究。醫護科技學刊。10(4),251-266。
王齡竟、陳毓文(2010)。家庭衝突、社會支持與青少年憂鬱情緒:檢視同儕、專業與家外成人支持的緩衝作用。中華心理衛生學刊。23(1),65-97。
楊孟麗(2005)。教育成就的價值與青少年的心理健康。中華心理衛生學刊。18(2),75-99。
陳毓文(2004)。少年憂鬱情緒的危險與保護因子之相關性研究。中華心理衛生學刊。17(4),67-95。

被引用紀錄


徐乙文、李承傑、董旭英(2021)。家庭關係對於國中生外向性偏差行為與學業適應問題之影響:以憂鬱情緒與認同非法手段為中介教育研究與發展期刊17(3),107-137。https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202109_17(3).0004
林靜宜(2022)。經濟處境不利青少年的壓力因應與教師支持之影響—以自我敘說觀點出發〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200635
劉燕萍(2017)。經濟弱勢少年從事部分工時工作的社會心理影響〔博士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201701207
陳亦柔、陸偉明(2022)。自尊、親子與師生關係對青少年至成年初顯期憂鬱症狀發展軌跡之探討中華輔導與諮商學報(63),71-109。https://doi.org/10.53106/172851862022010063003
劉宗幸、江守峻(2020)。家庭與學校依附脈絡因子對台灣青少年憂鬱症狀發展之縱貫研究教育學報48(2),135-155。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20181015001-202012-202012080006-202012080006-135-155

延伸閱讀