透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.17.128
  • 期刊

古籍板本考辨-以牌記著錄爲例

An Evaluation of Different Editions of Three Printed Old Books-Based on Colophons

摘要


古籍板本的鑒別,藉由牌記的著錄來辨識,係前賢鑒定古籍的眾多方法之一,也是後人賴以辨識一書板本的基本依據之一。筆者從事古籍整理,亦遵循前賢歸納的諸多條列;在實際進行中,仍然發現牌記足以淆亂板本判定的實例,即就所整理題爲「揚州阮氏琅環僊館刊本」之《經籍纂詁》、題爲「武英殿聚珍板原本」之《春秋繁露》及題爲「監本禮記殷氏藏板」之《禮記集說》三書所見到牌記上的問題,佐證前賢警戒後人於判別古籍板本時,必需謹愼處理,不能僅憑牌記所載,即驟然下斷語的勸誡。

關鍵字

古籍 板本 牌記 經籍纂詁 春秋繁露 禮記集說

並列摘要


There are many ways to ascertain the edition of an ancient printed book; one of them is to examine the contents of the ”Bei-Ji” (碑記,colophon). However, the contents of the ”Bei-Ji” sometimes contradict each other and cause incorrect judgement. This paper makes a thorough examination of three old ancient books collected in Tunghai University Library. The colophons of these books, Jing-Ji-Zuan-Gu(經籍纂詁) Chun-qiu Fan-lu(春秋繁露), and Li-ji Ji-shuo(禮記集說) present the case for further examinations. The Jing-ji Zuan-gu, lists several formal titles of the editor Ruan Yuan(阮元) in the Collected-Gems Edition(聚珍版,movable type) while the Chun-qiu Fan-lu and Li-ji Ji-shuo indicate that they were ”Block-Printed Editions of Guo-zi-jian(國子監). This paper is intended to analyze the causes of these discrepancies, and to date the edition as when they were carved and printed.

參考文獻


清阮元撰(1981)。十三經注疏。臺北大化書局。
清阮元撰(1995)。《續修四庫全書》經部小學類:經籍纂詁。上海古籍出版社。
清阮元撰(1964)。揅經室二集。臺北世界書局。
清金簡撰(1976)。四庫全書珍本:欽定武英殿聚珍版程式。臺灣商務印書館。
清張鑑、阮常生、阮福、阮孔厚、柳興恩撰、黃愛平點校(1995)。阮元年譜。北京中華書局。

被引用紀錄


許晋豪(2010)。中國古代出版廣告內涵研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.01153

延伸閱讀