透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.216.163
  • 期刊

Additional Ultrasound Therapy after Myofacial Trigger Point Injection for the Management of Postinjection Soreness

板機點注射後以超音波處理注射後酸感對療效的影響

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of trigger point injection (TPI) and combined treatment on an active myofascial trigger point (MrP). Design: A controlled clinical trial Setting: Our study was performed in a rehabilitation outpatient clinic. Participants: One hundred and sixty-two patients with active MrPs in the upper trapezius were investigated over a two year period, from 1995 to 1996. Forty-six healthy adults were included as the control group. Control study: The healthy subjects were assigned into three different groups which included healthy subjects without treatment (control group), patients without treatment (patient group) and patients accepting zero-intensity ultrasound treatment (placebo group). Therapeutic study : Eighty-four patients were treated by TPI. Among these, 43 patients had strong postinjection soreness (PIS) and thus were also treated by ultrasound (combined treatment). Main Outcome Measures: The pain threshold (PT) of a MrP, on the upper trapezius muscle, was measured by an algometer. The ””Index of threshold change”” (ITC) was defined as the ratio of post-treatment to pre-treatment PT. The range of motion (ROM) of side flexion of the cervical spine (X-ray) was measured by an go-niometer. The ””Index of ROM change”” (IRC) was defined as the ratio of post-treatment to pre-treatment ROM. ITC and IRC were used to measure the outcome of the different methods. Results: Both therapeutic groups revealed significant increases (P<0.05) in ITC and IRC, (Table 2 and 3). The combined treatment group had greater increases in ITC and IRC (P<0.05) than the other groups. PIS disappeared about 48 hrs after additional ultrasound therapy. Conclusion: Both kinds of treatment could relieve myofascial pain caused by MrPs. The combined treatment was the most beneficial method in this study, especially for patients with strong PIS

並列摘要


Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of trigger point injection (TPI) and combined treatment on an active myofascial trigger point (MrP). Design: A controlled clinical trial Setting: Our study was performed in a rehabilitation outpatient clinic. Participants: One hundred and sixty-two patients with active MrPs in the upper trapezius were investigated over a two year period, from 1995 to 1996. Forty-six healthy adults were included as the control group. Control study: The healthy subjects were assigned into three different groups which included healthy subjects without treatment (control group), patients without treatment (patient group) and patients accepting zero-intensity ultrasound treatment (placebo group). Therapeutic study : Eighty-four patients were treated by TPI. Among these, 43 patients had strong postinjection soreness (PIS) and thus were also treated by ultrasound (combined treatment). Main Outcome Measures: The pain threshold (PT) of a MrP, on the upper trapezius muscle, was measured by an algometer. The ””Index of threshold change”” (ITC) was defined as the ratio of post-treatment to pre-treatment PT. The range of motion (ROM) of side flexion of the cervical spine (X-ray) was measured by an go-niometer. The ””Index of ROM change”” (IRC) was defined as the ratio of post-treatment to pre-treatment ROM. ITC and IRC were used to measure the outcome of the different methods. Results: Both therapeutic groups revealed significant increases (P<0.05) in ITC and IRC, (Table 2 and 3). The combined treatment group had greater increases in ITC and IRC (P<0.05) than the other groups. PIS disappeared about 48 hrs after additional ultrasound therapy. Conclusion: Both kinds of treatment could relieve myofascial pain caused by MrPs. The combined treatment was the most beneficial method in this study, especially for patients with strong PIS

延伸閱讀