透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.196.217
  • 期刊

我國特殊教育資源中心網站品質評估之研究

An Evaluation of the Website Quality of Special Education Resource Centers in Taiwan

摘要


本研究旨在評估我國特殊教育資源中心網站之品質,面向有三:1建置內容充實程度、2內容品質、3介面設計品質。研究對象涵蓋各縣市31個特教資源中心,以自編「特殊教育資源中心網站檢核表」進行評估,結果如下:一、建置內容充實程度:9項檢核之中,有7項達到「足夠」的等級(網站簡介、相關服務、互動區、法令規章、研習進修、上傳下載、資源連結);2項落入「不足」等級(特教訊息、教學資源)。二、內容品質:6項檢核項目之中,有2項達到「優異」的等級(正確性、客觀性);而有3項達到「良好」等級(範圍性、時效性、權威性);僅有1項落入「普通」等級(合需求性)。三、介面設計品質:7項檢核項目之中,共有4項達到優異等級(美觀性、組織結構性、傳輸性、連結性);而有3項落入「普通」等級(多媒體性、可及性、互動性)。上述結果顯示出,我國特教資源中心網站整體品質屬於「良好」等級。建議可再充實特教新知與新聞訊息,普及線上資源借用系統。並且改善網站介面之無障礙瀏覽環境,提昇多媒體效果,創造良好之網站互動氣氛。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the website quality of Special Education Resource Centers (SERC) in Taiwan. Three dimensions were included in the evaluation checklist: (1) enrichment of the website, (2) quality of the content, and (3) quality of the design. This study selected 31 SERC websites from different counties and cities as evaluation targets. A self-developed ”Special Education Resource Centers Website Quality Checklist” was used to evaluate Taiwan's SERC website quality. The results of this study were as follows: (1) Enrichment of website (a total of 9 items): The website's previewing, related services, interaction, laws, training programs, downloading and uploading, and resource linkage were deemed ”sufficient.” It's information and materials were deemed ”insufficient.” (2) Quality of website content (a total of 6 items): The website's, accuracy and objectivity were deemed ”excellent”; its authority, scope, and currency were deemed ”satisfactory.” It's purpose was rated as ”fair.” (3) Quality of website interface design (a total of 7 items): The website's aesthetics, structure, transmission, and linking were deemed ”excellent”; its multimedia effects, accessibility, and interactivity were deemed ”fair.” The overall website quality of Taiwan's SERC was found to be satisfactory.

參考文獻


林坤燦、羅清水(2008)。台灣地區大專校院身心障礙學生對資源教室實施現況之調查研究。特殊教育學報。27,99-128。
許天威、蕭金土、吳訓生、林和姻、陳亭予(2002)。大專校院身心障礙學生學校適應狀況之研究。特殊教育學報。16,159-198。
Bartholomew, K.,Horowitz, L. M.(1991).Attachment styles among young adults: A test of four-category model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.61(2),226-244.
Bowlby, J.(1969).Attachment and loss: Vol. 1, Attachment.New York:Basic Books.
Bowlby, J.(1973).Attachment and loss: Vol. 2, Separation.New York:Basic Books.

被引用紀錄


陳乃亭(2012)。評估政府電子服務平台之品質與滿意度〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201200866
朱啟祥(2012)。知覺價值與轉換障礙如何影響再購意願:以Lativ實證研究為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.00434
黃鈺維(2016)。電子書借閱服務持續使用意願之探討─以台灣雲端書庫@高雄為例〔碩士論文,義守大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0074-1301201612470500
李欣餘(2017)。醫院網站品質與民眾認知醫院聲譽和認知醫院服務品質關聯之研究:信號理論觀點〔碩士論文,義守大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0074-0908201713555100

延伸閱讀