透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.46.36

並列摘要


It has been long argued that all scenarios should represent possible, not likely, futures and should not be assigned any probabilities. One argument is that the scenario team and managers should consider all the scenarios as equally likely and to prepare for each scenario. In addition, the strategic purpose of scenarios is to think of alternative futures and get away from financial and other types of time-series trend forecasts. On the other hand, there is a counter-argument that says that probabilities can and should be used with scenarios. These probabilities, however, are Bayesian in that they explicitly include assumptions, imagination, and expert judgment and that they go beyond trend projections. This paper reviews both arguments and makes recommendations as to when probabilities are appropriate for scenarios and when they are not.

被引用紀錄


李芃(2017)。卡特政府處理美中建交決策過程之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.01073
Pawinski, M. (2017). 複雜衝突環境中的文化構件:知識、覺知,與感受 [doctoral dissertation, Tamkang University]. Airiti Library. https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00533
舒孝煌(2016)。杜魯門總統使用原子彈的決策過程〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00425
郭悅恆(2015)。蘇聯在北伐前對國民黨政府之聯盟政策(1923-1926)〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.01006
顏大任(2014)。美國詹森政府時期之中國問題決策分析〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2014.01126

延伸閱讀