透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.13.201
  • 期刊

從SCI架構分析台灣社會福利經費及其分配效益-以1991年資料為例

Adopting SCI Framework to Evaluate Taiwan's Social Welfare Spending and Its Distributional Effects: 1991

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究採用Lampman的次級消費收入(econdary Consumer Income, SCI,或稱綜合社會福利)之研究架構,以探討我國的社會福利支出及其分配效益。本研究收集中央、省市、鄉鎮各級政府社會福利支出與民間社會福利經費,並使用行政院主計處家庭收支調查資料(含16,433戶之樣本)予以分析,並評估其分配效益。 依本研究之研究結果,1991年我國社會福利經費相當於全國生產毛額之18.7%,其中政府直接社會福利支出佔4.6%;教育支出佔6.4%;稅賦減免佔3.2%;慈善事業支出佔0.6%;家庭間的移轉收入佔2.7%;以及非薪資報酬佔l%。 就分配效益而言,現金給付之最大受益者為享受稅賦減免與家庭間移轉收入者,實物給付之最大受益者為有在學子女之家庭。社會福利的主要支付者為非貧窮之非老人,其支付所有社會福利經費的86.4%,除了非貧窮非老人之人口群外,其他三組人口群(包括貧窮之非老人;非貧窮之老人;以及貧窮之老人)所得之福利給付均超過他們所付出的稅負支出,非貧窮之老人得到最多的淨福利給付,為其平均家庭收入之7.8%,主因他們獲得較多的老年給付及稅賦減免。貧窮者(定義為所得分配最低20%的人口群)得到所有福利給付的13.3%。

並列摘要


The study adopts Lampman's comprehensive measures, or Secondary Consumer Income (SCI) framework, to investigate Taiwan's overall social welfare spending, to analyze the distributional effects of such social welfare expenditures. The Analysis is based on 1991 aggregated data gathered from various agencies and the 1991 Family Income and Expenditure Survey, a multiple-purpose data conducted annually by the Directorate-general of Budget, Accounting and Statistics. This survey has a sampling rate of 0.387% of the National population and includes 16434 households. This study has found that, using the comprehensive measures, social welfare expenditures in 1991 amounted to 18.7%of the GNP. The comprehensive welfare expenditures included public welfare spending (4.6% of the GNP), education (6.4% of the GNP), tax savings (3.2% of the GNP), philanthropy (0.6% of the GNP), direct interfamily gifts (2.7% of the GNP) and wage diversion (1% of the GNP). In term of the distributional effects, those people who qualified for tax savings or received interfamily gifts were the ones who benefited the most from cash benefits. Families with school age children were the major recipients of in-kind benefits. The nonaged nonpoor was the group that paid for the most (86.4%) of the SCI benefits. The poor, difined as the bottom 20% of the income distribution, received 13.3% of all the SCI benefits. Except for the nonaged nonpoor, the other three groups-the nonaged poor, the aged nonpoor and the aged poor-received benefits exceeding the taxes and contributions they paid. The aged nonpoor received the largest net benefits (7.8% of the mean household income) because they received a considerable number of old age pensions and tax benefits.

被引用紀錄


李詩柔(2015)。非營利組織於實物給付福利的協調合作─以高雄市實物銀行為例〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2015.00122
黃明鳳(2009)。台灣地區各縣市社會福利支出、人力資本對所得分配影響之研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1111200915521351

延伸閱讀