透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.188.152.162
  • 期刊

台灣府際財政治理的競合關係:一個網絡分析的實證研究

The Competitive and Cooperative Relationships of Intergovernmental Fiscal Governance in Taiwan: A Network Analysis

摘要


本文承繼著作者在二○○五年所出版《制度、網絡與府際治理》一書中的問題意識與思考脈絡,並在該研究的基礎上,從地方政府財政首長的觀點出發檢視在統籌分配稅款議題中地方政府間的互動樣態。並以網絡分析法來進一步思考研究府際間財政治理關係的可能性。本文希望能夠透過網絡分析法,針對該書中同一筆問卷資料進行重新的過錄與解讀,這樣的金圖顯現出兩個重要的目的:第一,在目前公共行政學界中,談到治理的機制,最大的共識便是在網絡的環境中進行治理的工作,但如何實際的對治理機制的運作,進行一個嚴謹且符合科學方法的檢驗,日前仍未有太大的進展。本文的目的是初步嘗試將網絡分析法運用在府際治理關係的分析上,希望能替公共行政學界帶入網絡分析的視野,協助公共行政學界在探討以關係為互動本質的公共事務,能有更經得起檢驗的研究方法;第二、就目前府際關係的研究而言,大多從法制面或歷史面對關係的發展進行陳述,較為缺乏的反而是從行動的層次來理解府際的關係。本文即將以府際間的財政關係為個案,並以網絡分析法為分析的方法,將分析落實到中央與各縣市間財政關係的相互依賴模式探索上。

並列摘要


This paper follows the research questions discussed in the book Institution, Network and Intergovernmental Governance (2005). Social network analysis, in this paper, is applied to re-analyze the same data collected by authors in 2003 to help us to examine the patterns of relationships among intergovernmental relations. This paper will have two important contributions to research community of public administration in Taiwan. First, social network analysis method will give us a guideline to analyze the complex governance phenomenon in public affairs. The paper will be the first one to try to apply social network analysis to answer the research questions regarding governance mechanism. Second, the researches on intergovernmental governance mostly emphasize on formal institutional and historical perspectives, and few researches focus on the dynamic relationships among county governments. Our research will provide another answer to the intergovernmental competitive and cooperative governance mechanism in fiscal intergovernmental relations. Our paper demonstrates three research outcomes. The first is that the financial resources centralize on Taipei and Kaohsiung cities and the financial allocation situation is disequilibrium one among 23 counties in Taiwan. The second is that the character of cooperative relationship is a stable alliance among agricultural county governments which DPP is in power. The third is that Taipei and Kaohsiung city governments are two financial resources competitors without collaborative relationships with other counties in Taiwan.

參考文獻


吳若予(2004)。台灣統籌分配稅款制度的政治性。台灣民主季刊。1(2),131-165。
王光旭(2006)。政策網絡研究在公共行政領域中的核心地位與方法錯位。政策研究學報。4,61-102。
Bache, I.,Matthew Flinders (Eds.)(2005).Multi-level Governance.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Banfield, E. C.(1961).Political Influence.New York:Free Press.
Bardach, E.(1998).Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship.Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institution Press.

被引用紀錄


鍾文文(2009)。從新莊中港大排願景工作坊之運作探討協力網絡之形成〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2009.01146
陳柏溢、陳冠至(2021)。清代紹興府藏書家之社會網絡分析圖資與檔案學刊(98),83-131。https://doi.org/10.6575/JILA.202106_(98).0003
蘇暐勝(2017)。立法院政策過程之論述網絡分析研究—以2008至2015年產業創新條例修法歷程為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201703364
葉于瑄(2017)。我國十二年國民基本教育議題網絡之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201700473
鍾瑞萱(2016)。食品風波下的府際關係:以臺灣廢食用油品事件為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201600562

延伸閱讀