透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.48.135
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

並列摘要


This article describes the key steps of scenario writing to facilitate problem-based learning discussion to aid student learning of basic medical science in combination with clinical medicine. The scenario has to amplify and deepen the students' thinking so that they can correlate findings from the case and knowledge from textbooks. This can be achieved in three ways: (1) a comparison of cases; (2) demonstrating a scientific link between symptoms and basic medicine; and (3) introducing a personal and emotional aspect to the scenario. A comparison of two cases enables us to shed light on the pathological differences and think about the underlying biological mechanisms. These include: (a) a comparison of two cases with similar symptoms, but different diseases; (b) a comparison of two cases with different symptoms, but the same cause; and (c) a comparison of two cases, with an easy case, followed by a complicated case. The scenarios may be disclosed in a sequence to show a scientific link between symptoms of the patient and basic medicine, which may help to cultivate a physician with a scientific mind. Examples are given by the relationship between: (a) symptoms, pathology and morphology; and (b) symptoms, pathology and physiology. When the scenario is written in such a way that students are personally and/or emotionally involved in the case, they will be more motivated in learning as if involved in the case themselves. To facilitate this, the scenario can be written in the first-person perspective. Examples include <||>Ⅰ had a very bad headache, and vomited several times…<||>, and <||>Ⅰ noticed that my father was screaming at night…<||>. The description of the events may be in chronological order with actual time, which makes students feel as if they are really the primary responding person.

並列關鍵字

discussion problem-based learning scenario writing

延伸閱讀


  • 歸人(1968)。Writing andLife現代學苑5(11),23-27。https://doi.org/10.7065/MRAS.196811.0006
  • Wong, H. Y. (1993). Teaching of writing [master's thesis, The University of Hong Kong]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0029-1812201200003106
  • Hayward, P., & Morrow, R. (2009). An Integral Approach to Scenarios. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(3), 115-118. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10276084-200902-13-3-115-118-a
  • Tsoi, S. P. (2009). Writing as the Sinthome [doctoral dissertation, The University of Hong Kong]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0029-1812201200016155
  • 王瑋佩 (1993). Evaluating Writing. 文藻學報, (7), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.7085/WJ.199303.0097

國際替代計量