身心障礙者社區化就業服務方案之成本效益與成本效能分析－以臺北市92-94年度就服方案為例

Cost-benefit and Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Community-based Employment Program for People with Disabilities-An Example of 2003-2005 Employment Program in Taipei City

王雲東(Yun-Tung Wang)

《臺大社會工作學刊》 14期 (2007/01) Pp. 123-166

https://doi.org/10.6171/ntuswr2007.14.03

摘要

本研究從成本效益與成本效能分析的觀點，使用貫時性研究的方法，針對台北市92-94年度身心障礙者社區化就業服務方案進行分析。研究結果當方案剛結束時、總社會淨效益值為每人每年7,396.73元，而益本比為1.460；同時參與者的淨效益值也應為正值，這表示本方案確實有相當程度的機會將福利資源作有效率地運用並提升社會財富分配的公平性。至於若考慮到敏感性分析，則總社會淨效益值更至少上升到每人71,447.19元，益本比2.480。此外在92-94各年分別的狀況中可看出：每年的社會淨效益值均大於0，而且不斷升高，顯示現行制度是符合成本效益的。不過在不同障別間的比較方面，聽語障礙類、視覺障礙類與綜合類的益本比與成本效能比狀況較好，而相對地精神障礙類與心智障礙類則較不佳。

關鍵字

身心障礙者 ； 社區化就業 ； 支持性就業 ； 成本效益分析 ； 成本效能分析

並列摘要

This study, based on cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis perspective and using longitudinal research method, analyzed 2003-2005 Employment Program for the People with Disabilities in Taipei City. The social net monetary benefit just after this program is $NT7,396.73 per participant per year. The benefit cost ratio is 1.460. At this time, the net monetary benefit for the participants is more likely to be positive. It shows that this program is likely to be efficient and equal for the whole society. If considering social benefit stream, it is very possible that the social net monetary benefit can be at least $NT71,447.19 per participant. The benefit cost ratio will be 2.480 then. In addition, the annual social net monetary benefits are positive and keep rising between 2003 to 2005. However, the benefit/effectiveness cost ratios of different categories of the people with disabilities are different. The benefit and effectiveness cost ratios of the category of the people with hearing/voice/speech mechanism, vision, and collective disabilities are larger than those with chronic psychosis and mental disability.

並列關鍵字

people with disabilities ； community-based employment ； supported employment ； cost-benefit analysis ； cost-effectiveness analysis

參考文獻

內政部統計處網站

Boardman, A.(1996).Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice.NJ:Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Bond G.R.,Dietzen, L.L.,Vogler, K.(1995).Toward a framework for evaluating costs and benefits of psychiatric rehabilitation: three case examples.Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation.5(2),75-88.

Bordieri, J.E.,Comninel, M.E.(1987).`Competitive employment for workers with disabilities: An international perspective`.Journal of Rehabilitation, July/Aug/Sep.51-57.

Clark,R.E.,Xie, H.(1998).Benefits and costs of supported employment from three perspectives.Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research.25(1),22-35.