透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.133.112.73
  • 期刊

警察、檢察官、法官對社工認知之探討:以家庭暴力與性侵害案件處理為例

The View of the Police Officer, Prosecutor and Judge on Social Workers in Dealing with Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Cases

摘要


因應性侵害犯罪防治法及家庭暴力防治法等保護令法令之立法施行,在維護被害人權益的訴求下,社工人員的工作場域必須擴大至警察、檢察及法院系統中。本研究旨在瞭解警察、檢察官及法官與社工接觸的經驗,探討該三類人員對社工專業能力與表現的的認知情形,以及對社工參與案件處理之功能看法及其相關因素。本研究以問卷調查方式詢問承辦家庭暴力及性侵害案件之法官、檢察官及警察,結果發現三體系人員因角色不同、與社工存在不同的關係;對於社工功能的看法,檢察官有顯著較高的評價。社工進入司法系統,所發揮的功能以提升被害人服務品質有最高的評價,其次為提升案件處理品質、最後則是促進司法人員處理案件動力。另亦發現社工司法倡導滲透、改變司法體系文化效果部分已逐漸發酵;而社工是否「好用」,是影響社工功能被肯定的最重要因素。最後根據研究結果,提出深化跨領域知識的建構、建構社工與司法之合作模式、強化社工司法倡導能量、司法體系跨大建置對被害人之服務機制及未來研究方向等五項建議。

並列摘要


In the past decade, the Sexual Assault Prevention Act and Domestic Violence Prevention Act have been implemented in Taiwan. According to these laws, social workers have to enter the police departments, prosecutors' office and courts to advocate for their clients. Therefore, social workers have more interactions with police officers, prosecutors and judges. This paper aimed to examine the three professionals' interactive experiences with social workers, and explore the impacts of social worker's legal advocacy. This study collected opinion from judges, prosecutors and police officers who were in charge of domestic violence and sex assault cases. Results from this study suggest that police officers have great understanding about the role of social workers, and more likely to make requests to social worker's assistance, compared with prosecutors and judges. However, results also suggest that police officers feel more frustrated from cooperation with social workers. Moreover, the results indicate that the relationships with social workers are different among the judge, prosecutors and police officers. Social workers have imbued and change the culture of these three systems gradually. In addition, police officers, prosecutors and judges perceive that providing service for victims in the justice system is the social welfare agency's responsibility, rather than theirs. The regression analysis results indicate that the social worker's professional ability is the most important factor associated with these three professionals' opinions on the impacts of social worker's advocacy. Finally, this study proposes five suggestions for practice fields service programs and future studies.

參考文獻


內政部(2009)。〈家庭暴力案件統計〉。上網日期:2009 年5 月20 日,取自內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會網頁http://dspc.moi.gov.tw/public/Attachment/9299342771.xls
苗栗地方法院檢察署(2009)。〈犯罪被害人保護服務處〉。上網日期:2009年3 月1 日。取自苗栗地方法院檢察署網頁http://www.mlc.moj.gov.tw/mp014.html
Allison, J. A.,Wrightsman, L. S.(1993).Rape: The misunderstood crime.Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications.
Barker, R. L.(2003).The social work dictionary.Washington, D.C.:NASW.
Bell, M. E.,Goodman, L. A.(2001).Supporting battered women involved with the court system: An evaluation of a law school-based advocacy intervention.Violence Against Women.7(12),1377-1404.

被引用紀錄


許珍維(2012)。司法場域中社會工作者個案倡導之策略與影響因素:以「駐地方法院家庭暴力事件服務處為例」〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2012.00060
汪芩如(2011)。婚姻暴力防治社會工作者工作壓力之研究—以各縣市家暴中心為例〔碩士論文,國立暨南國際大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2011.00085
黃志中(2013)。以後現代女性主義重構婚姻暴力受虐婦女診療驗傷之內涵與意義〔博士論文,國立高雄師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6817/NKNU.2013.00030
吳敏欣(2017)。受暴老人保護令撤回原因探討社會發展研究學刊(),110-129。https://doi.org/10.6687/JSDS.201711/SP.0005
陳怡青、鄒國儀(2023)。司法社會工作者角色與專業養成-以藥癮戒治場域的經驗為起點刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊(36),39-82。https://doi.org/10.6460/CPCP.202312_(36).0002

延伸閱讀