Web2.0線上學習網站評鑑指標之研究－以社會技術系統觀點探討

E-Learning Website Evaluation Criteria for Web2.0-Socio-Technical System Approach

余鑑(Chien Yu) ； 于俊傑(Chin-Cheh Yu) ； 余采芳(Tsai-Fang Yu) ； 鄭宇珊(Yu-Shan Cheng) ； 李依凡(Yi-Fan Lee)

《Electronic Commerce Studies》 9卷1期 (2011/03) Pp. 5-34

https://doi.org/10.29767/ECS.201103.0001

摘要

本研究之目的在發展Web 2.0線上學習網站評鑑指標，作爲企業組織之線上學習網站平台層面的參考依據。以德懷術調查法進行研究，經14位Web 2.0領域專家學者三回合問卷，架構出具有共識的評鑑指標，發展出Web 2.0線上學習網站評鑑指標。本研究發現經由三回德懷術專家問卷的調查問卷，彙整其意見與進行統計分析後，確定此評鑑指標之架構爲2個評鑑構面、4個評鑑指標層面，56個評鑑指標項目。其所獲得之研究結果是綜合實務界與學術界專家群之論點，建構出Web 2.0線上學習網站的評鑑指標，以供未來在學術或企業在建置互動性網站時，皆可藉由此評鑑指標，以作爲證明、改進、比較、追蹤、解釋、分析和預測數位學習成效之依據。

關鍵字

Web 2.0 ； 社會技術系統 ； 線上學習網站評鑑指標

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was the development of Web 2.0 e-learning website evaluation criteria as organization of e-learning platform level, a reference site. Delphi survey method to study the field by 14 experts and scholars Web2.0 three rounds of questionnaires, which reflects a consensus of evaluation, the development of a Web 2.0 e-learning website evaluation criteria. The study found that three rounds of Delphi through the questionnaire survey of experts, their opinions and to compile statistical analysis, to determine the structure of this evaluation indicators for the two evaluation dimensions, four levels of evaluation index, evaluation 56 criteria project. The results obtained in this study is a comprehensive group of practitioners and academic experts of the arguments, construct a Web 2.0 e-learning website evaluation indicators for future academic or business in the build interactive website may apply by this evaluation criteria, as proof, improve, comparison, tracking, interpretation, analysis and forecasting basis for digital learning.

並列關鍵字

Web2.0 ； socio-technical system ； e-learning website evaluation criteria

參考文獻

鍾瑞國、楊寶華(2006)。發展企業數位學習成效評鑑指標之研究。人力資源管理學報。6(1)，123-140。

Tim O'Reilly (2005). What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved May 26, 2010, from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html

Meriluoto, J. (2008). Knowledge Management and Information Systems – Finding a Sociotechnical Golden Mean. Accessed online March 2008 at http://www.knowledgeboard.com/download/629/KM_IS.pdf

Pavlac, B. A. (2005). Internet Source Evaluation. Retrieved October, 28, 2005 from http://staff.kings.edu/bapavlac/sourceeval.html

BIOME(2005a). Factors affecting the quality of an information source. Retrieved October 24, 2007 from http://biome.ac.uk/guidelines/eval/factors.html#scope