透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.143.17.128
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

文化政策中的經濟論述:從菁英文化到文化經濟?

Economic Discourse in Cultural Policy: From Elite Culture to Cultural Economy

摘要


從1990年代開始,西方與台灣的經驗中發現:文化政策中經濟論述的不斷增強,並與經濟產業政策有密切整合的可能;文化政策所強調的價值從美學、社會轉向經濟價值;文化概念的持續擴大、但邊界的越形模糊;藝術/娛樂、傳統菁英/大眾藝術、高級/通俗藝術、或是公共贊助/商業文化之間的區隔逐漸消弭;文化政策關注的對象從藝術、文化工業擴大為創意產業。這樣的發展趨勢使得文化政策如今成為「非常重要」但也可能隨時被忽略與質疑的政策,而面臨新的矛盾與危機。 因此,本文希望從文化政策的角度出發,進而思索當代文化藝術的價值與概念轉變的問題。本文主要論點在於,隨著90年代末期「文化創意產業」政策的提出,標示出文化政策裡一個轉變的趨勢:從傳統的國家、公民論述轉向經濟論述,在這個轉變的趨勢裡,文化的概念也逐漸由傳統的「菁英文化」轉變為「文化經濟」的概念,背後隱藏著文化藝術在當代社會中,其被賦予的價值已經有很大的不同。

並列摘要


This paper explores the development of 'creative industries' in cultural policy based on the following two perspectives: 1) changing cultural values and 2) the broadening of the definition of the term 'culture'. This paper further highlights policy trends observed in western societies and Taiwan. Such trends include: economic factors taking on increasing importance in cultural policymaking, with the potential to integrate to a significantly greater degree cultural and economic policies; the shift of the focus of cultural policy from aesthetic and social values to economic values; the increasingly blurred definition of 'culture' that is occurring concomitantly with the increasingly inclusive definition of that term. The boundaries between the arts and entertainment, elite and mass culture, and public and commercial culture are disappearing. Under this situation, cultural policy is both viewed as 'very important', while being 'ignored' at the same time. The result is that such policies are currently facing challenges and crises that are quite different than previously faced. Therefore, this paper hopes to rethink the values and concept of culture from cultural policy. The main argument is that 'creative industry' shows an important turn from 'state discourse', 'citizenship course' to 'economic discourse'. In addition, the concept of culture is moving from 'elite culture' to 'cultural economy'. The values of culture have been changed in contemporary society.

參考文獻


Arnold, Matthew(1960).Culture and Anarchy.Cambridge:the University Press.
Bennett, Oliver(1994).'Introduction' in European Journal of Cultural Policy.1(1),1-2.
Bourdieu, Pierre,John G. Richardson (eds.)(1986).Handbook of Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education.Westport, Connecticut:Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre、孫智綺譯(2003)。以火攻火:催生一個歐洲社會運動。台北:麥田。
Cancili, Nestor Garcia,Gigi Bradford(eds.),Michael Gary(eds.),Glenn Wallach (eds.)(2000).The Politics of Culture: Policy Perspectives for Individuals, Institutions and Communities.New York:The New Press.

被引用紀錄


關傑予(2018)。文化對地方的中介之分析—以蘇州誠品的展示經營為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2018.00278
吳宜倫(2017)。產品類型與產品設計構面之關係-以文化創意產業之手工製品為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00536
雷映青(2017)。變遷與延續:中國大陸網路自製劇之產業研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2017.00084
楊璨羽(2008)。音樂產業與文化政策:一個獨立音樂視野的探討〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2008.00338
詹育娟(2012)。泰雅族織物工藝品之商業模式-以野桐工坊為例〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2012.00454

延伸閱讀