透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.146.221.204
  • 期刊

兩岸銀行業經營績效與生產力之探討

The Study of both Sides of the Banking Sector of Performance and Productivity

摘要


本研究採用資料包絡分析法(DEA)與麥氏生產力指數(MPI)評估兩岸銀行的經營績效、生產力變動與經營類型分析。樣本取自台灣經濟新報(TEJ),選取06-09年本國銀行26家及大陸銀行14家之資料。實證分析結果,大陸銀行純技術效率(PTE)、成本效率(CE)與配置效率值(AE)皆顯著高於本國非金控銀行;本國銀行技術效率(TE)與CE無效率原因,皆來自PTE較多,大陸銀行則分別來自規模效率(SE)與PTE較多;兩岸銀行處於規模報酬遞減者為最多,約佔73%以上06-09年本國銀行MPI平均值為0.990且呈現逐年下滑的現象,而大陸銀行MPI平均值為0.897且呈現逐年上升現象;本國與大陸銀行分別屬於「低效率且低生產力」與「高效率但低生產力」者最多。

並列摘要


This study uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Malmquist productivity index (MPI) assess the performance of cross-strait banking, productivity changes and operational types. Samples taken from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ), 06-09 years, selected 26 domestic banks and 14 Mainland banks information. Empirical analysis, pure technical efficiency Continental Bank (PTE), cost efficiency (CE) and the value of allocative efficiency (AE) were significantly higher than their non-bank financial holding company : national bank technical efficiency (TE) and CE without efficiency reasons, all from PTE more mainland banks from scale efficiency (SE) with the PTE more; cross-strait banking is decreasing returns to scale had the highest, accounting for more than 73%; 06-09 years, an average of 0.990 MPI domestic banks and has been declining Phenomenon, and Continental Bank and MPI showed an average annual increase of the phenomenon of 0.897; domestic and Continental Bank were a ”low efficiency and low productivity ”and ”high efficiency but low productivity” by most.

被引用紀錄


吳瑄娟(2014)。台灣金融控股公司經營績效評估-DEA與灰預測法之應用〔碩士論文,長榮大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6833/CJCU.2014.00105
林永耀(2014)。金融風暴對兩岸銀行效率與生產力影響之探討〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2611201410182324
許弘儒(2015)。兩岸經濟合作架構協議對台灣銀行業營運效率之影響〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614014711

延伸閱讀