運動員主動性人格與教練領導風格對運動員無動機之預測

Athletes' Proactive Personality and Coach Leadership Style's Prediction of Athletes' Amotivation

黃丹臨 ； 季力康

《休閒觀光與運動健康學報》 8卷1期 (2018/03) Pp. 32-41

摘要

研究目的：本研究目的檢視運動員主動性人格與教練領導風格在預測運動員無動機的主要效果與交互作用效果。方法：本研究參與者為國內大專院校運動隊伍之選手，共135名（男＝60，女＝76）平均年齡約為20歲。本研究採用問卷調查法，經參與者同意後，請選手填寫主動性人格量表、自主支持教練領導風格量表、控制教練領導風格量表、和無動機量表。結果：經由多元階層迴歸分析發現，第一，主動性人格可以負向的預測運動員無動機。第二，自主支持教練風格與控制教練領導風格皆可以預測運動員無動機，其中自主支持教練領導風格為負向預測，控制教練領導風格為正向預測。第三，主動型人格 控制教練領導風格能有效預測運動員無動機。結論：第一，本研究發現在低控制領導風格的情況下，運動員有較低的無動機，反之在高控制教練領導風格的情況下，運動員有較高的無動機。第二，當運動員有較高的主動性人格時，不論在低控制教練領導風格或是高控制教練領導風格時皆有明顯較低的無動機水準；但在運動員主動性人格傾向低時，高控制教練領導風格和低控制領導風格會造成運動員無動機顯著的差異。

關鍵字

自主支持教練領導風格 ； 控制教練領導風格 ； 主動性人格

並列摘要

Purposes: The purpose of this study is to examine the main effects and interaction effects of athletes' proactive personality and coach leadership style in predicting athletes' amotivation. Methods: Participants in this study were athletes from domestic colleges and universities. A total of 135 (male = 60, female = 76) athletes were about 20 years old. This study used a questionnaire survey method. After the participants agreed, the contestants were asked to fill in the proactive personality scale, autonomy supportive coach leadership style scale, control coach leadership style scale, and the amotivated scale. Results: Through multivariate regression analysis, it is found that, firstly, proactive personality can negatively predict athletes’ amotivation. Second, autonomy supportive coach leadership style and control coach leadership style can predict athletes amotivation, and autonomy supportive coach leadership style is negative prediction. The control coach leadership style is the positive prediction. Third, the proactive personality × control coach leadership style can effectively predict the athletes' amotivation Conclusion: First, this study finds that athletes have lower amotivation in the case of low-control leadership style. Conversely, in the case of high-control coach leadership style, athletes have higher amotivation. Second, when athletes have higher proactive personality, has a significantly lower level of amotivation in both low-control coaching styles and high-control coaching styles. However, when the athlete's proactive personality tends to be low, the high control coach leadership style and low control leadership style will result in significant differences in athletes' motivation.

並列關鍵字

autonomy supportive coach leadership style ； control coach leadership style ； proactive personality