飛靶射擊注意力量表之編製

Development of the Attention Inventory for Clay Shooting

章嘉倩(Chia-Chien Chang) ； 季力康(Li-Kang Chi)

《大專體育學術專刊》 98年度 (2009/05) Pp. 485-492

https://doi.org/10.6695/AUES.200905_98.0063

摘要

本研究目的在於編製適用於飛靶射擊運動的注意力量表，並探討不同背景變項的射擊選手在注意力上的差異情形。參與者為男性66名，女性13名。依據Nideffer（1976）TAIS量表的理論架構為編製藍本，並參考飛靶射擊運動情境，勾勒出量表初步因素有寬廣外在注意（BET）、外在刺激過度負荷（OET）、寬廣內在注意（BIT）、內在刺激過度負荷（OIT）、狹窄注意（NAR）、過度窄化注意（RED）等六個。研究結果發現：一、飛靶射擊注意力量表因素包括上述六個分量表，共計21道題目。六個因素累積的解釋變異量為70.23%，各因素Cronbach α值，除了BET、NAR內部一致性略低外，其他分量表具有良好的內部一致性。二、不同性別與注意力的差異，男性選手在BET上較女性選手高。三、國手與非國手在注意力的差異，OIT、RED等負向因素中國手明顯低於非國手的選手；而在BIT、BET等因素中國手顯著優於非國手。四、在射擊項目與注意力的差異，BIT因素中的定向與雙不定向選手顯著優於不定向選手，而定向與雙不定向選手間沒有差異。本研究所編製的飛靶射擊注意力量表已建立初步信、效度，可供飛靶選手評量注意力之用。未來的研究亦可運用此量表探討與運動注意力相關的其他變項之關係，期能對飛靶選手有所瞭解及幫助。

關鍵字

注意與人際型態量表 ； 定向 ； 不定向 ； 雙不定向

並列摘要

The purposes of this study were: first, to develop a clay shooting attention inventory and second to examine the differences of attentions among different background clay shooters. Participants were 79 (66 males and 13 females) clay target shooters. The preliminary Attention Inventory for Clay Shooting (AICS) was based on the Test of Attentional and Interpersonal Style (TAIS) by Nideffer (1976) and revised by taking clay shooting conditions into consideration. It contains six subscales: Board external attentional focus (BET), overloaded by external stimuli (OET), board internal attentional focus (BIT), overloaded internal stimuli (OIT), narrow attentional focus (NAR), reduced attentional focus (RED). The results indicated that 21-item AICS contains six factors (BET, OET, BIT, OIT, NAR, RED) and total explained variance was 70.23%. The Cronbach's α for BET and NAR were .60 and .66. Rest of factors' Cronbach's α were acceptable with value from .72 to .86. In terms of examining the differences of attentions among different background clay shooters, males scored higher on BET than females. In addition, the national team shooters scored lower on OIT, RED than non-national team shooters, however, the national team shooters scored higher on BIT, BET than non-national team shooters. Furthermore, subscales of AICS, the skeet and double trap shooters scored higher on BIT than trap shooters. There was no difference between skeet and double trap shooters on AICS. The AICS has shown as a valid and reliable instrument to assess clay shooters attention. The future study can examine the relationships between attention and other related variables to understand and help the clay shooters.

並列關鍵字

test of attention and interpersonal style ； skeet ； trap ； double trap