透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.138.204.208
  • 期刊

關鍵查核事項是制式八股文嗎?

Are KAMs Boilerplate Disclosures?

摘要


本研究首先利用文字探勘的分析工具檢視影響關鍵查核事項(KAMs)揭露內容變化的決定因素。具體而言,利用2016年與2017年臺灣會計師查核報告的KAM文本,我們將KAM的內容區分為全文內容、風險描述以及查核程序描述,並檢視影響KAM文本差異程度的因素。實證結果顯示,就KAM全文內容而言,企業提供的財務資訊(包含流動資產變化、自由現金流量變化、資產規模變化與營收成長變化)與主簽會計師的個人風格都顯著影響KAM文本差異程度。進一步的分析顯示,主簽會計師的個人風格係反映於查核程序描述而非風險描述。最後,我們發現KAM的文本差異程度與當期分析師的盈餘預測行為有關。換言之,本研究提供KAMs不是制式八股文的佐證,此外也提供KAM的內容具經濟後果的證據性。

並列摘要


This study employs methods of textual analysis to examine the determinants of textual modification in disclosures of key audit matters (KAMs). Specifically, analyzing KAMs disclosed in the audit reports in Taiwan for the fiscal years of 2016 and 2017, we classify the content of KAMs as either risk-related or audit procedure-related, and examine the determinants of modification in KAMs. Empirical results suggest that the fundamental financials (i.e., changes in current assets, free cash flows, size, and growth) and the individual style of the lead audit partner significantly influence textual modification in KAMs. Results from a further analysis indicate that textual modification in the description of audit procedures, but not in the description of risk, reflects the individual style of the lead partner. Finally, we provide evidence for an association between textual modification in KAM disclosures and analyst forecasts. In other words, our findings suggest that KAM disclosures are more than standardized or boilerplate communications and potentially reflect corporate financial performance.

參考文獻


薛敏正、郭俐君、秦嘉偉與邱律嘉,2020,查核風格與財報報表可比較性:會計師事務所組別之探討,中華會計學刊,16卷 (1期):頁1-35。
曾家璿與史雅男,2019,會計師產業專精與關鍵查核事項揭露之關聯,中華會計學刊,15卷 (1期):頁37-76。
林孝倫與郭俐君,2016,台灣會計師更換之市場反應,當代會計,17卷 (2期):頁235-264。
Abernathy, J. L., F. Guo, T. R. Kubick, and A. Masli. 2019. “Financial statement footnote readability and corporate audit outcomes.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 38 (2): 1-26.
Alicke, M. D. 2000. “Culpable control and the pshchology of blame.” Psychological Bulletin 126 (4): 556-574.

延伸閱讀