透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.137.64
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

政治轉型過程中的婦女運動:以運動者及其生命傳記背景為核心的分析取向

The Women's Movement in Taiwan's Political Transition: An Approach Focused on the Biographical Backgrounds of Activists

若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


過去的社會運動研究強調政治機會結構對於運動的組織與策略的影響,卻忽略了這樣的影響,是透過行動者及其生命傳記背景,在環境的限制下所主動選擇的。本文以運動者的調查訪談資料為主指出:組織劇碼、議題與策略皆不是中性的。不同生命傳記背景的運動者會傾向選擇不同的組織模式,這些選擇也會回過來影響運動者的組成,進而影響運動的議題與策略。八○年代台灣婦女運動的先驅者有著教育、階級的優勢與特殊的族群構成,她們選擇基金會等無須草根動員的組織模式,使得其運動路線偏向社會服務、立法與文化宣傳。九○年代新進的運動者及其不同的生命傳記背景與新的組織模式,是推動婦女運動在變遷的政治環境中的新動力。因此,九○年代後期的性政治爭議與政黨認同的衝突,可以被視為是運動者不同的生命傳記背景與政治機會結構的互動,所產生的結果。

並列摘要


Most studies on social movements fail to adequately explain through what kind of mechanisms changing political opportunities influence social movements. I believe that an important reason is that inadequate attention has been given to the role of activists and their biographical backgrounds. Using quantitative survey data and interviews with activists in Taiwan's women's movement, the author explains the trajectory of that movement during Taiwan's democratic transition. The central argument consists of two parts. First, the activists' biographical backgrounds played an important role in shaping the movement's organizational repertoire, tactics, and choice of issues. Specifically, the activists' biographical backgrounds influenced the choice to use organizational models that did not require grass roots mobilization (e.g., publishing houses, social service organizations, and foundations), yet they also developed a party-neutral lobbying strategy to accompany the emphasis on social service and cultural advocacy. Second, changing political opportunities, especially the shift from authoritarianism to democracy, should not be considered a neutral factor among activists from different backgrounds. Consequently, activists should be viewed as the primary intervening variable impacting the movement's interactions with changing political opportunities.

參考文獻


顧燕翎(1996)。從移植到深耕:婦女研究在台灣(1985-1995)。近代中國婦女之研究。4
朱元鴻(1998)。娼妓研究的另類提問。台灣社會研究季刊。30,1-34。
駱明慶(2001)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊。29(2),117-152。
Abdulhadi, Rabab(1998).The Palestinian Women's Autonomous Movement:Emergence, Dynamics, and Challenges.Gender and Society.12(6),649-673.
Clemens, Elisabeth(1997).The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

被引用紀錄


徐子軒(2012)。國家民主化之國際社會化研究:台灣、貝南與保加利亞的比較分析〔博士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2012.01204
王昱培(2015)。罪與罰:臺灣刑罰規範變遷的社會學初探〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2015.00283
蔡宜文(2013)。台灣異性戀男女青春羅曼史的性別分析〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2013.00605
韓鈴(2006)。中國新興婦女組織運動:運動者性別意識啟蒙經驗與組織策略〔碩士論文,國立清華大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6843/NTHU.2006.00385
鍾逸帆(2015)。邁向同性婚姻平權社會:立法模式與司法判決模式之比較分析〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/CYCU.2015.00132

延伸閱讀