黑格爾的哲學就是宗教－朋霍費爾在他的早期文本中對黑格爾的批判

雖然朋霍費爾在他短暫的一生中涉獵了廣泛的哲學，但黑格爾在他的一生中扮演了十分特殊的角色。一九三三年在柏林大學任教期間，朋霍費爾開設過一門關於黑格爾的研討課，足以證明他對黑格爾的興趣和重視。在他的早期著作中，朋霍費爾密集地評論和解釋黑格爾的哲學，但這些評論主要採取了批判性的態度。本文將分析朋霍費爾在《聖徒相通》中，從社會哲學和社會學的角度對黑格爾哲學進行的批判。他認為，由於黑格爾的哲學缺乏社會性維度，因此與基督教的啟示不相容。此外，在《行動與存在》中，朋霍費爾認為，黑格爾哲學中的界限概念被吞沒了。本文想要強調他對黑格爾的這些批判揭示了宗教批判的內在邏輯。

關鍵字

朋霍費爾；黑格爾；社會性；界限；宗教

並列摘要

Although Bonhoeffer explored a broad range of philosophy during his brief life, Hegel played an especially significant role in his intellectual development. His interest in and attention to Hegel are evident from the fact that he taught a seminar on Hegel at the University of Berlin in 1933. In his early writings, Bonhoeffer offered intensive commentary and explanation of Hegel's philosophy, but his comments were primarily critical in nature. This article analyzes Bonhoeffer's critique of Hegel's philosophy from socio-philosophical and sociological perspectives, as presented in Sanctorum Communio. He believed that due to the lack of a social dimension in Hegel's philosophy, it is incompatible with the revelation of Christianity. Additionally, in Akt und Sein, Bonhoeffer contended that Hegel's philosophy swallowed up the concept of boundaries. This article emphasizes that Bonhoeffer's critiques of Hegel revealed the inner logic of critique of religion.

並列關鍵字

Bonhoeffer ； Hegel ； Sociality ； Boundary ； Religion

主題瀏覽