- 會議論文
大都會地區住宅平面類型之比較－以臺北和上海的集合住宅為例
A Comparison of Types of Floor Plans in Metropolitan Areas-A case study on congregated housing in Taipei and Shanghai as an example
摘要
海峽兩岸在政治、經濟和文化上有著密不可分的關係，隨著時間的推移，讓社會運作與生活方式各朝著不同方向發展。本研究企圖瞭解臺北市與上海市集合住宅空間構成的差異，文稿針對臺北市28件（92例房型）「社會住宅」建案、以及上海市20件（112例房型）「公租房」建案，共計取得204例政府限定出租的集合住宅作為研究分析的基礎，再透過文獻回顧與文本分析的方式，以住宅的坪數、入口形式和平面類型為構面進行分類比較與探討。研究結果顯示：文本所蒐集的兩大都市住宅案例之面積皆集中於10－20坪區間，且各入口形式的佔比序次一致，皆以「公室通過形」為主流，但受對象的建成年代與特殊房型之影響，部分通過類型在比率上產生差異。此外，本研究平面類型將「套房一體型」和「套房分離型」，與「多房型」分開比較；最終整彙出，無論是「套房型」住宅或「多房型」住宅，臺北市「社會住宅」的私密度普遍高於上海市「公租房」，且受海峽兩岸大都會居住模式與文化差異的影響，導致上海市出現了較為擁擠，但私密度較高的住宅形態。
並列摘要
Both sides between the Taiwan Straits are closely linked politically, economically and culturally, and the society and lifestyle develop toward different directions over time. This study attempts to learn about the differences between Taipei City and Shanghai City in spatial composition of congregated housing. In this paper, 204 congregated housing cases which governments restrict to rent are totally obtained as the basis for analysis, including 28 ＂social housing＂ cases (92 suites) in Taipei City and 20 ＂public rental housing＂ cases (112 suites) in Shanghai City. Then, by literature review and text analysis, this paper classifies, compares and discusses congregated housing according to their area, entrance forms and types of floor plans. According to the results, most housing cases of the two major metropolises collected in this paper range from about 33 to 66m2, with ＂passable common areas＂ as the mainstream entrance form. However, due to completion year and special house types of subjects, the proportion of some entrance forms is different. In addition, ＂integrated suites＂, ＂partitioned suites＂ and ＂multi-room houses＂ are compared in this study by types of floor plans. In conclusion, for both ＂suites＂ and ＂multi-room houses＂, ＂social housing＂ in Taipei City is more private than ＂public rental housing＂ in Shanghai City. Due to the different residential models and cultures on both sides of the Taiwan Straits.