如何評讀隨機控制試驗之證據品質－以中醫護理介入措施為例

How to appraise quality of evidence for randomized controlled trials: An example of Chinese medicine nursing intervention

王玉眞(Yu-Jen Wang) ； 葉美玲(Mei-Ling Yeh)

《中西醫結合護理雜誌》 4期 (2020/11) Pp. 45-51

https://doi.org/10.6211/TTCMNA.202011_(4).0004

摘要

實證研究的證據品質判斷須經由嚴格評析，即是應用適當的評讀工具以及採取公正客觀的立場，根據研究結果的有效性、可信賴性以及可運用性檢視證據的真實性與精確性。本文以一中醫護理介入措施之隨機控制試驗文章為例，以常用的CASP（Critical Appraisal Skills Program）11個問題評析證據品質。冀望評讀內涵以及結果有助於提升護理人員了解CASP評讀工具應用，以及進一步判斷證據品質。

關鍵字

嚴格評讀 ； 證據品質 ； 隨機控制試驗

並列摘要

To judge the quality of evidence for any study should be through a process of critical appraisal, apply appropriate critical appraisal tools, and judge with fairness and objectiveness. That is based on validity, reliability, and applicability from study results to appraise the truth and accuracy of study. The CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Program) with 11 questions is commonly applied to appraise and judge the quality of evidence of randomized controlled trial. This article explains the quality of evidence based on the appraisal contents and consequence through an example of the randomized controlled trial on Chinese medicine nursing intervention. This would improve nurses to understand the application of the CASP tool, and further judge the quality of evidence.

並列關鍵字

critical appraisal ； CASP (critical appraisal skills program) ； quality of evidence ； randomized controlled trial