摘要
《传道书》的结构问题一直以来都吸引着《传道书》研究者的注意力。早期有释经学者提出《传道书》是一部谚语的集合，甚至没有结构可言。而近30年来的研究成果表明这种观点已逐渐被现代释经学家所摒弃。无论作品经过怎样的编撰过程，其现有形式才是我们分析的对象，也只有呈现在我们面前的这个文本形式对我们产生意义。尽管表面看来《传道书》经文内容较为散乱，并引用大量谚语，但是学者们通过对经文特征的考察，从不同角度试图分析其所传达内容的构成方式。本篇论文旨在梳理自20世纪70年代末开始直到目前一代又一代释经学者对《传道书》文学结构的不同分析，考察各种分析的利弊。即便这仍是一个没有唯一答案的难题，这样的梳理对我们充分理解这部作品仍能产生积极意义。
並列摘要
When it comes to the question of the structure of Qoheleth, or even the question of whether it has a structure, a variety of opinions exist. Early scholars believe that Qoheleth consists of a random compilation of sayings. But during the last thirty years, most scholars insist that the book is highly organized. No matter how many redactions involved in the formation of the text, its present form should be the object of our research, and it is the present text would have meaning to us. This paper aims to present the different opinions among scholars with regard to the structure of Qoheleth from 1970s. Even if no consensus has been reached, from the merits of those distinguished analyses, we could shape our own understanding of the book.