透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.60
  • 學位論文

你的加分不是你的加分 – 原住民加分政策改制對教育支出之影響

Affirmative Action and Education Investment

指導教授 : 林明仁
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


2006 年,教育部宣布原住民於大專入學時的加分保障制度,改為外加名額並以其當時之人口比例為上限。本論文使用雙重差分法(difference-in-differences design),分析此政策對原住民家庭教育支出之影響。結果顯示,迴歸分析中所發現的整體正向效果,源自於高教育背景之家庭為因應限縮的名額,大幅增加對學齡子女之教育投資。在使用不同樣本定義和模型的延伸分析中,不只確立了前述發現的穩健性,更發現教育投資在雙重維度之下的異質性。

並列摘要


In 2006, the Ministry of Education in Taiwan announced a restriction on affirmative education policy for indigenous students in college admission. This thesis applies a difference-in-differences method to examine how the rising competitiveness in the new system could affect the indigenous households’ education investment. The surprisingly positive effect is found to be originated from the significant heterogeneity across parental education. Indigenous parents with high education backgrounds increased their spending on their child’s education greater than other parents. Further analyses with different samples and methods support a two-dimensional heterogeneous response under the new policy and ensure the robustness of findings.

參考文獻


Adermon, Adrian, Mikael Lindahl, and Ma ̊rten Palme. 2021. “Dynastic human Capital, inequality, and intergenerational mobility.” American Economic Review, 111(5): 1523–1548.
Akee, Randall K. Q., William E. Copeland, Gordon Keeler, Adrian Angold, and E. Jane Costello. 2010. “Parents’ incomes and CHILDREN’S outcomes: A Quasi-Experiment using transfer payments from casino profits.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(1): 86–115.
Arcidiacono, Peter, Michael Lovenheim, and Maria Zhu. 2015. “Affirmative action in undergraduate education.” Annual Review of Economics, 7(1): 487–518.
Black, Sandra E. 1999. “Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2): 577–599.
Black, Sandra E., Paul J. Devereux, and Kjell G. Salvanes. 2005. “Why the APPLE Doesn’t FALL Far: Understanding intergenerational transmission of human capital.” American Economic Review, 95(1): 437–449.

延伸閱讀